<

Overview :: Guardian Angels

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Göte Lindehag K 32 18 11 81.68%         19.71 +1.71 (9.49%)
Robert Burley K 35 13 2 14.85%         11.25 -1.75 (-13.46%)
Wes Briggs D 35 17 12 89.10% 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 2 (0.17) 18.21 +1.21 (7.11%)
Oscar Enelid D 27 16 11 81.68% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.18) 17.18 +1.18 (7.39%)
Rafael Torcato D 34 15 6 44.39% 1 (0.17) 1 (0.17) 1 (0.17) 2 (0.33) 15.30 +0.30 (2.00%)
Matts Grön D 30 15 9 66.83% 1 (0.11) 3 (0.33)   1 (0.11) 16.68 +1.46 (9.56%)
Joseph Walsh D 21 9 0 0.00%         0.00 -
Mattias Källström M 30 17 13 89.27% 4 (0.33) 11 (0.92) 1 (0.08) 5 (0.42) 17.02 +0.02 (0.14%)
Leon Dalby M 32 17 13 96.53% 2 (0.15) 4 (0.31) 2 (0.15) 4 (0.31) 18.10 +1.10 (6.47%)
Lucas Eklund M 31 16 11 81.68% 2 (0.18) 2 (0.18) 1 (0.09) 3 (0.27) 17.05 +0.96 (5.97%)
Eremia Salomir M 34 15 10 70.86% 1 (0.10) 3 (0.31) 3 (0.31) 4 (0.42) 15.74 +0.74 (4.93%)
Lars Löfkvist M 34 15 10 74.25% 1 (0.10) 2 (0.20)   1 (0.10) 15.38 +0.58 (4.12%)
Mattis Bock M 33 13 2 10.82% 1 (0.69) 1 (0.69)   1 (0.69) 13.15 +0.15 (1.15%)
Silviu Minciunã M 21 6 0 0.00%         0.00 -
Tadeo Mazzoli S 34 17 12 89.10% 6 (0.50) 16 (1.33)   6 (0.50) 17.12 +0.12 (0.74%)
Giovanny Gibellini S 31 16 13 96.53% 3 (0.23) 8 (0.62) 1 (0.08) 4 (0.31) 16.51 +0.51 (3.17%)
Ramo Cinetto S 21 8 0 0.00%         0.00 -
70.54% 24 53 11 35 16.31 + 0.59 ( 3.48%)
  1. Guardian Angels - Dens Dafties (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Guardian Angels - Thà Sàramos United (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  3. IFK Juve - Guardian Angels (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Guardian Angels - IFK Juve (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  5. Thà Sàramos United - Guardian Angels (0 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Dens Dafties - Guardian Angels (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. S.L. SabugAll - Guardian Angels (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  8. Guardian Angels - S.L. SabugAll (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Guardian Angels - FC Ballbreakers (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  10. FC Ballbreakers - Guardian Angels (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  11. Guardian Angels - Icarus Flight (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  12. Icarus Flight - Guardian Angels (8 - 9) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Guardian Angels - Smögens IF (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top