<

Overview :: 50 City

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Alan Gygax K 25 9 19 99.09%         10.58 +1.58 (17.54%)
Hans-Dieter Figni D 26 10 19 96.49%   1 (0.05) 2 (0.11) 2 (0.11) 12.21 +2.21 (22.11%)
Theodore Hoyte D 32 9 17 78.17%   1 (0.07)     10.24 +1.24 (13.73%)
Gerhard Femerling D 27 9 10 50.06%     3 (0.31) 3 (0.31) 12.10 +3.10 (34.44%)
Jasper Martins D 21 7 17 66.95%         7.06 +0.06 (0.84%)
Hisao Kobayashi D 23 6 13 32.60% 1 (0.16) 1 (0.16)   1 (0.16) 5.85 -0.15 (-2.56%)
Reggie McCullough D 21 6 18 85.66%   1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 7.56 +1.56 (25.93%)
Roberto Yakin D 17 4 3 7.31%         4.33 +0.33 (8.33%)
Francois Zubriggen M 29 9 13 61.39% 4 (0.34) 7 (0.59)   4 (0.34) 9.31 +0.31 (3.42%)
Anselmo Nemminger M 24 8 18 84.07% 1 (0.06) 8 (0.50) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12) 10.17 +2.17 (27.08%)
Artur Schagl M 24 8 17 88.44% 6 (0.35) 10 (0.59) 1 (0.06) 7 (0.41) 9.65 +1.65 (20.59%)
Cristoph Visser M 22 8 19 89.63% 1 (0.06) 4 (0.23) 5 (0.29) 6 (0.35) 9.26 +1.26 (15.79%)
Ermin Montanari M 26 8 17 87.47% 2 (0.12) 6 (0.36) 1 (0.06) 3 (0.18) 9.12 +1.12 (13.97%)
Américo Cristo M 28 7 15 41.84% 1 (0.12) 3 (0.37) 2 (0.25) 3 (0.37) 8.07 +1.07 (15.24%)
Heinrich Struer S 27 9 12 45.58% 3 (0.34) 9 (1.03) 1 (0.11) 4 (0.46) 9.42 +0.42 (4.63%)
Urs Burki S 29 7 17 62.64% 2 (0.17) 8 (0.67)   2 (0.17) 8.24 +1.24 (17.65%)
Dáire McFadden S 20 6 7 12.76%     1 (0.41) 1 (0.41) 6.14 +0.14 (2.38%)
64.13% 21 59 18 39 8.78 + 1.14 (14.18%)
  1. Spurs - 50 City (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. 50 City - FC Hoffmeister (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Mohab Kamel FC - 50 City (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Wuppertaler SV - 50 City (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. 50 City - Harris Rangers (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  6. 50 City - Harland Wolff Welders (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  7. 50 City - BoringEngineers (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  8. SV Werder Bremen - 50 City (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. BoringEngineers - 50 City (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. 50 City - SV Werder Bremen (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  11. Mechanix Tigers - 50 City (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  12. Harland Wolff Welders - 50 City (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  13. 50 City - Mechanix Tigers (0 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Harris Rangers - 50 City (1 - 4) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  15. The Rod Squad - 50 City (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  16. 50 City - Wuppertaler SV (1 - 2) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  17. 50 City - Mohab Kamel FC (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  18. FC Hoffmeister - 50 City (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  19. 50 City - Nadheva (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top