<

Overview :: Warehouse Warriors

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Wayne Coupland K 27 10 13 58.32%         12.46 +2.46 (24.62%)
Iker Casillas K 17 4 9 40.96%         3.67 -0.33 (-8.33%)
Torre Cupi D 30 14 20 94.55%     4 (0.20) 4 (0.20) 16.55 +2.55 (18.21%)
Mathew Strodder D 30 14 1 4.73%         15.00 +1.00 (7.14%)
Carl Frelbert D 28 12 13 57.71%     1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 15.23 +3.23 (26.92%)
Carl Bergmark D 26 11 19 81.91%   2 (0.12) 3 (0.17) 3 (0.17) 13.16 +2.16 (19.62%)
Ernest Ngalle D 28 11   1 4.73%         12.00 +1.00 (9.09%)
Vitus Pomi D 23 9 10 41.16%         9.90 +0.90 (10.00%)
Pascoal Martelo D 20 8 10 39.88%         7.10 -0.90 (-11.25%)
Erik McGowan D 18 4 8 29.91%         4.50 +0.50 (12.50%)
Sturla Vigfússon M 27 14 21 95.68% 2 (0.10) 7 (0.35) 2 (0.10) 4 (0.20) 14.81 +0.81 (5.78%)
Michael Ross M 29 14 2 6.32%     1 (0.75) 1 (0.75) 13.50 -0.50 (-3.57%)
Guido Hülsmann M 28 13 18 82.22% 7 (0.40) 16 (0.92) 5 (0.29) 12 (0.69) 15.11 +2.11 (16.24%)
Ronny Merkle M 29 12 19 81.91%   5 (0.29) 2 (0.12) 2 (0.12) 14.89 +2.89 (24.12%)
Brian Caunce M 24 11 18 75.69% 1 (0.06) 7 (0.44) 4 (0.25) 5 (0.31) 12.50 +1.50 (13.64%)
Ignacio Tommasi M 19 4 11 52.00%   1 (0.09)     5.36 +1.36 (34.09%)
Lars-Erik Fjellborg M 17 4 12 50.57%   2 (0.19) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 5.58 +1.58 (39.58%)
Rodrigo Bezerra S 27 14 14 55.70% 3 (0.25) 11 (0.93) 1 (0.08) 4 (0.34) 15.50 +1.50 (10.71%)
Peder Rønne S 32 14 4 18.91% 5 (1.25) 8 (2.00)   5 (1.25) 17.50 +3.50 (25.00%)
Federico Lippi S 30 13 15 62.13% 7 (0.53) 18 (1.37) 2 (0.15) 9 (0.68) 14.93 +1.93 (14.87%)
Purav Sawant S 22 8 9 35.61% 4 (0.53) 11 (1.46) 2 (0.27) 6 (0.80) 7.89 -0.11 (-1.39%)
Zach A Smith S 17 4 5 21.48% 1 (0.22) 2 (0.44)   1 (0.22) 4.20 +0.20 (5.00%)
49.64% 30 90 28 58 11.43 + 1.33 (13.30%)
  1. Warehouse Warriors - Montpelier View (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Milan Van Java - Warehouse Warriors (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Warehouse Warriors - AC Pecorino (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. Spurs - Warehouse Warriors (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Acemulan - Warehouse Warriors (0 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 3-4-3]
  6. Team Trotter - Warehouse Warriors (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Warehouse Warriors - MissChip United (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  8. Melbourne - Warehouse Warriors (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Warehouse Warriors - Mechanix Tigers (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Warehouse Warriors - Newton Heath (4 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Arsenal FC - Warehouse Warriors (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  12. Newton Heath - Warehouse Warriors (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  13. Warehouse Warriors - Arsenal FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Farlan United - Warehouse Warriors (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  15. Mechanix Tigers - Warehouse Warriors (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  16. Warehouse Warriors - Farlan United (2 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Warehouse Warriors - Melbourne (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  18. MissChip United - Warehouse Warriors (1 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  19. Warehouse Warriors - Acemulan (0 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  20. AC Pecorino - Warehouse Warriors (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  21. Montpelier View - Warehouse Warriors (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top