<

Overview :: Melbourne

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Rodney Björkmyr K 29 12 7 31.65%         14.29 +2.29 (19.05%)
Dustin Hatton K 23 10 15 67.63%         11.73 +1.73 (17.33%)
Martino Hornos D 30 15   7 31.04%   1 (0.15)     16.71 +1.71 (11.43%)
Toby Worrall D 23 11 18 74.15%     1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 11.89 +0.89 (8.08%)
Muzaffer Köse D 33 11 15 70.09% 1 (0.07) 3 (0.20) 2 (0.13) 3 (0.20) 13.93 +2.93 (26.67%)
Emanuele Siligardi D 23 10 17 70.50% 2 (0.13) 15 (1.01) 1 (0.07) 3 (0.20) 12.88 +2.88 (28.82%)
Trond-Egil Brenden D 25 10 14 58.17%   1 (0.08)     11.21 +1.21 (12.14%)
Hans-Christian Hølmebakk D 22 8 12 50.10%         10.42 +2.42 (30.21%)
Carles Aranzubia D 17 5 12 37.05%         6.67 +1.67 (33.33%)
Vladut Pâclisan M 31 13 18 77.08% 7 (0.43) 16 (0.98) 6 (0.37) 13 (0.80) 13.50 +0.50 (3.85%)
Myles Cornfeld M 30 12 17 67.27% 3 (0.21) 9 (0.63) 4 (0.28) 7 (0.49) 13.88 +1.88 (15.69%)
Ailean Elder M 28 12 1 4.73%     1 (1.00) 1 (1.00) 15.00 +3.00 (25.00%)
Jacinto Portela M 25 11 15 61.56% 4 (0.31) 9 (0.69) 7 (0.54) 11 (0.84) 13.13 +2.13 (19.39%)
Rayman Josema M 24 11 17 71.79% 1 (0.07) 7 (0.46) 1 (0.07) 2 (0.13) 11.59 +0.59 (5.35%)
Axel Arneberg M 20 9 16 48.92% 3 (0.29) 8 (0.77)   3 (0.29) 10.44 +1.44 (15.97%)
Danny Gardiner M 21 9 17 62.18%   2 (0.15) 4 (0.30) 4 (0.30) 10.35 +1.35 (15.03%)
Hilario Rubi M 16 4 11 34.33% 2 (0.28) 2 (0.28)   2 (0.28) 4.55 +0.55 (13.64%)
Shinjiki Mastubayashi S 31 11 6 19.37% 3 (0.73) 4 (0.98) 1 (0.24) 4 (0.98) 11.67 +0.67 (6.06%)
Nicolau Cordeiro S 24 10 16 65.11% 5 (0.36) 16 (1.16) 3 (0.22) 8 (0.58) 11.31 +1.31 (13.12%)
Dennis Gâlcescu S 21 9 18 63.82% 3 (0.22) 22 (1.63) 1 (0.07) 4 (0.30) 9.56 +0.56 (6.17%)
Josu Alarcon S 19 5 11 25.54%   1 (0.19)     5.82 +0.82 (16.36%)
52.00% 34 116 32 66 11.45 + 1.55 (16.32%)
  1. Melbourne - MissChip United (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Melbourne - Trees FC (5 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Montpelier View - Melbourne (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Melbourne - MissChip United (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Mechanix Tigers - Melbourne (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-4-1]
  6. Legends FC - Melbourne (7 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  7. Arsenal FC - Melbourne (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Melbourne - Warehouse Warriors (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Melbourne - AC Pecorino (5 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Atletico BK - Melbourne (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Acemulan - Melbourne (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  12. Melbourne - Atletico BK (1 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 5-4-1]
  13. Melbourne - Acemulan (0 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Melbourne - Chelsea Old Boys (4 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  15. AC Pecorino - Melbourne (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  16. Chelsea Old Boys - Melbourne (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  17. Warehouse Warriors - Melbourne (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  18. Melbourne - Exodia (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  19. Melbourne - Mechanix Tigers (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  20. Melbourne - Montpelier View (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  21. MissChip United - Melbourne (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top