<

Overview :: Quahog Griffins

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Walter Opschoor K 30 15 13 72.00%         17.48 +2.48 (16.56%)
Juan-Carlos Corazón K 20 6 5 27.69%         7.20 +1.20 (20.00%)
Pilib Shea D 29 14 18 99.70% 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.11) 3 (0.17) 17.36 +4.31 (33.03%)
Angelo Cristiano D 34 14 1 5.54%         18.80 +4.80 (34.29%)
Leonardo Misco D 30 12 18 99.70%     5 (0.28) 5 (0.28) 15.31 +3.31 (27.59%)
Kenneth Clemons D 22 10 13 66.71%     1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 12.28 +2.28 (22.85%)
Marcus Ingman D 21 8 10 44.07%   2 (0.25) 1 (0.13) 1 (0.13) 9.34 +2.24 (31.64%)
Heini Næss D 20 5 4 22.16%         7.22 +2.23 (44.50%)
Uli Frenzel M 29 14 18 98.62% 5 (0.28) 15 (0.84) 6 (0.34) 11 (0.62) 16.53 +3.48 (26.75%)
Michael Broadfoot M 28 13 18 99.70% 6 (0.33) 13 (0.72) 2 (0.11) 8 (0.44) 15.12 +2.12 (16.28%)
Ronny Kratz M 24 11 15 79.59% 8 (0.56) 10 (0.70) 3 (0.21) 11 (0.77) 12.67 +2.60 (25.76%)
Andrej Mizourov M 35 11 16 88.62% 3 (0.19) 6 (0.38) 7 (0.44) 10 (0.62) 13.22 +1.29 (10.97%)
Nathaniel Bassett M 21 8 12 40.16%   1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 8.35 +1.27 (18.10%)
Nicky Lang M 21 7 7 32.27%         9.29 +2.29 (32.65%)
Emerson Castelhano S 35 11 13 69.05% 10 (0.80) 14 (1.12) 4 (0.32) 14 (1.12) 13.82 +1.90 (16.01%)
Norihiro Hida S 23 10 16 80.61% 3 (0.21) 9 (0.62) 4 (0.27) 7 (0.48) 12.38 +2.38 (23.81%)
Joseph Paulis S 20 6 9 34.80% 2 (0.32) 4 (0.64) 1 (0.16) 3 (0.48) 7.43 +2.32 (46.44%)
Kaspar Cornelius S 20 5 9 35.70% 3 (0.47) 5 (0.78)   3 (0.47) 5.69 +1.58 (38.33%)
60.93% 41 80 37 78 12.20 + 2.45 (26.98%)
  1. Quahog Griffins - Lester City (3 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  2. Big Test Icicles - Quahog Griffins (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  3. Quahog Griffins - Lethal Formula (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Damiens Devils - Quahog Griffins (0 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Quahog Griffins - Montreal Nippers (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Whipping Foxes - Quahog Griffins (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. Quahog Griffins - Animals (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Dumpster Divers - Quahog Griffins (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Harlington Accies - Quahog Griffins (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Quahog Griffins - Harlington Accies (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-4-3]
  11. Quahog Griffins - Dumpster Divers (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-4-1]
  12. Animals - Quahog Griffins (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  13. Quahog Griffins - Foxes FC (6 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Montreal Nippers - Quahog Griffins (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  15. Quahog Griffins - Damiens Devils (2 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  16. Lethal Formula - Quahog Griffins (0 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  17. Quahog Griffins - Big Test Icicles (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  18. Lester City - Quahog Griffins (1 - 4) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top