<

Overview :: CA River Plate

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Enrico Longo K 35 14 10 70.99%         16.80 +2.80 (20.00%)
Konstantin Nedelkovic K 24 10 4 28.40%         13.50 +3.50 (35.00%)
Rolando Zerbini D 33 13 13 89.43%   1 (0.08) 2 (0.16) 2 (0.16) 16.69 +3.69 (28.40%)
Alojzy Owisak D 29 13 12 79.71%   2 (0.18) 2 (0.18) 2 (0.18) 14.17 +1.17 (8.97%)
Wen Xuan Kok D 27 12 12 82.33%     2 (0.17) 2 (0.17) 14.58 +2.58 (21.53%)
Iuliu Brumã D 23 10 8 44.29%         12.12 +2.12 (21.25%)
Ion Lentini D 24 10 9 57.95%     1 (0.12) 1 (0.12) 13.11 +3.11 (31.11%)
Charlie Dobie D 21 7 5 29.63%   1 (0.24)     10.00 +3.00 (42.86%)
Enzo Robledal M 27 13 13 81.64% 3 (0.26) 7 (0.61) 2 (0.17) 5 (0.43) 14.92 +1.92 (14.79%)
Bane Miler M 32 13 13 92.28% 4 (0.31) 12 (0.92) 10 (0.77) 14 (1.08) 15.62 +2.62 (20.12%)
Diego Federico M 28 12 12 83.10% 3 (0.26) 6 (0.51) 1 (0.09) 4 (0.34) 14.42 +2.42 (20.14%)
Fabiano Compagnon M 28 12 14 99.38% 7 (0.50) 20 (1.43) 1 (0.07) 8 (0.57) 14.71 +2.71 (22.62%)
Matei Enãchioiu M 24 11 10 69.29% 1 (0.10) 4 (0.41)   1 (0.10) 13.50 +2.50 (22.73%)
Zico Assunção M 23 9 7 35.80% 2 (0.40) 3 (0.59)   2 (0.40) 11.14 +2.14 (23.81%)
Julien Doolan S 28 13 13 92.28% 4 (0.31) 15 (1.15) 3 (0.23) 7 (0.54) 15.23 +2.23 (17.16%)
Matija Jokovic S 26 11 8 56.79% 4 (0.50) 6 (0.75)   4 (0.50) 12.38 +1.38 (12.50%)
68.33% 28 77 24 52 13.93 + 2.49 (22.69%)
  1. CA River Plate - Stoke City F.C. (1 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Paris Saint Germain - CA River Plate (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  3. CA River Plate - Manchester UTD (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  4. CA River Plate - Lazio (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. FK Vucje - CA River Plate (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Parma - CA River Plate (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  7. CA River Plate - FC Red Bull Salzburg (2 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  8. FC Red Bull Salzburg - CA River Plate (2 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. CA River Plate - Parma (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. CA River Plate - FK Vucje (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  11. Lazio - CA River Plate (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Manchester UTD - CA River Plate (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  13. CA River Plate - Paris Saint Germain (0 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Stoke City F.C. - CA River Plate (1 - 4) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top