<

Overview :: SR Colmar

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Bane Drazevic K 21 10 4 99.19%         10.75 +0.75 (7.50%)
Claudio Gentile D 34 15 3 71.43%         14.00 -1.00 (-6.67%)
Jonathon Cresswell D 35 11 4 68.73%   1 (0.36)     12.50 +1.50 (13.64%)
Mondola Hammed D 24 11 3 74.39%   1 (0.33)     12.67 +1.67 (15.15%)
Pontus Nordensjö D 23 10 4 99.19%         12.25 +2.25 (22.50%)
Dragisa Vujasinovic D 23 10 4 83.02%   1 (0.30)     11.25 +1.25 (12.50%)
Des Sheen M 33 13 4 99.19% 3 (0.75) 3 (0.75) 2 (0.50) 5 (1.25) 15.75 +2.75 (21.15%)
Pelle Ernemark M 24 11 4 99.19%     1 (0.25) 1 (0.25) 12.75 +1.75 (15.91%)
Joop van der Kruis M 23 10 4 99.19% 1 (0.25) 2 (0.50) 2 (0.50) 3 (0.75) 12.00 +2.00 (20.00%)
Motoharu Ogami M 23 10 3 61.99%   3 (1.20)     11.67 +1.67 (16.67%)
Massimo De Cicco M 22 10 4 74.39%     2 (0.67) 2 (0.67) 10.00 -
Hidetoshi Nakata M 35 10 1 12.40%         12.00 +2.00 (20.00%)
Kurt Sivertsson S 23 11 4 76.82% 4 (1.29) 8 (2.58)   4 (1.29) 10.50 -0.50 (-4.55%)
Rodrigo Zarate S 24 11 4 71.97%   1 (0.34)     12.75 +1.75 (15.91%)
77.93% 8 20 7 15 12.20 + 1.37 (13.05%)
  1. SR Colmar - Fk Buducnost Arilje (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  2. SR Colmar - Mando Ramos F.C. (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. KS Barcelona - SR Colmar (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. SR Colmar - Juventus (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top