<

Overview :: Ducking Quackers

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Jack Edge K 32 11 10 70.82%         14.10 +3.10 (28.18%)
Bento Palhota K 22 6 4 28.33%         8.00 +2.00 (33.33%)
Djati Subrata D 31 11 14 99.15% 1 (0.07) 5 (0.36) 3 (0.21) 4 (0.29) 13.64 +2.64 (24.03%)
Alejandro Zarate D 31 11 14 92.76%         15.29 +4.29 (38.96%)
Thorbjörn Berglin D 21 8 11 77.91%         10.64 +2.64 (32.95%)
Yoshitaka Miyosi D 18 5 5 34.72%     2 (0.41) 2 (0.41) 7.40 +2.40 (48.00%)
Jan Erik Ljosdahl-Rasmussen D 19 5 7 49.58%         5.86 +0.86 (17.14%)
Clyde Simon M 35 13 14 99.15% 2 (0.14) 6 (0.43) 1 (0.07) 3 (0.21) 12.93 -0.07 (-0.55%)
Mee Prasertsakul M 27 11 13 87.84% 5 (0.40) 9 (0.73) 1 (0.08) 6 (0.48) 12.31 +1.31 (11.89%)
Ljubisa Vucinic M 23 11 12 80.75%   4 (0.35) 4 (0.35) 4 (0.35) 12.50 +1.50 (13.64%)
Montrel Dal Moro M 25 9 13 88.30% 3 (0.24) 14 (1.12) 4 (0.32) 7 (0.56) 11.38 +2.38 (26.50%)
Richie Lithgow M 21 7 11 68.90%   3 (0.31)     8.09 +1.09 (15.58%)
Manuel Stanekovic M 19 6 6 42.49% 2 (0.33) 5 (0.83) 1 (0.17) 3 (0.50) 9.17 +3.17 (52.78%)
Federico Pazat S 25 10   10 70.82% 3 (0.30) 14 (1.40) 2 (0.20) 5 (0.50) 10.60 +0.60 (6.00%)
Gerard van Tiggelen S 22 8 2 10.85%   1 (0.65)     9.50 +1.50 (18.75%)
Teruyuki Enamoto S 22 8 7 45.80% 3 (0.46) 13 (2.01) 1 (0.15) 4 (0.62) 9.57 +1.57 (19.64%)
Carl-Gustaf Engdahl S 19 5 5 35.41% 1 (0.20) 3 (0.60)   1 (0.20) 5.00 -
63.74% 20 77 19 39 10.35 + 1.94 (24.18%)
  1. Ducking Quackers - FC Parmo (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  2. Assassins Creed - Ducking Quackers (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  3. Ducking Quackers - Istanbullers (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Ducking Quackers - LL Urban Achievers (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Floyds Barbers - Ducking Quackers (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. The Cheechsters - Ducking Quackers (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. Ducking Quackers - Dunkerrin Rovers (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Dunkerrin Rovers - Ducking Quackers (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Ducking Quackers - The Cheechsters (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Ducking Quackers - Floyds Barbers (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. LL Urban Achievers - Ducking Quackers (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Istanbullers - Ducking Quackers (0 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 5-4-1]
  13. Ducking Quackers - Assassins Creed (1 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-3-3]
  14. FC Parmo - Ducking Quackers (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top