<

Overview :: FC Daninator

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Chin Tze Jian K 31 14 107 78.34%         12.29 +0.89 (7.21%)
Wong Leong Pin K 26 9 27 18.59%         6.31 -0.32 (-4.60%)
Jackie Chan K 35 9 2 1.50%         4.75 -4.25 (-47.22%)
Jez Ackram K 19 6 2 1.50%         5.95 +0.45 (7.50%)
Low Kee Min D 29 14 108 76.27% 1 (0.01) 6 (0.06) 5 (0.05) 6 (0.06) 12.25 +1.79 (15.92%)
Dion Livingstone D 33 13 69 50.84% 2 (0.03) 9 (0.13) 11 (0.16) 13 (0.19) 14.38 +1.66 (12.85%)
Teoh Jie Sheng D 28 12 83 52.70% 1 (0.01) 24 (0.34) 2 (0.03) 3 (0.04) 9.63 +1.04 (12.86%)
Lau Yi Siang D 26 12 75 47.75% 2 (0.03) 14 (0.22) 4 (0.06) 6 (0.09) 9.68 +0.96 (10.57%)
Liew Keng Soon D 35 12 119 85.84% 5 (0.04) 8 (0.07) 10 (0.09) 15 (0.13) 13.06 +1.90 (16.75%)
Joe Vivier D 34 12 16 12.02% 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12)   1 (0.06) 12.23 +0.23 (1.93%)
Chai Chen Hean D 25 11 47 25.13% 1 (0.03) 3 (0.09) 3 (0.09) 4 (0.12) 7.85 -0.15 (-1.11%)
Marat Fedin D 33 10 21 15.74% 1 (0.05) 1 (0.05)   1 (0.05) 10.05 +0.52 (5.31%)
Nario Di Vaio D 18 4   2 1.05%         4.35 +0.35 (8.75%)
Lee Seng Keet M 31 13 122 86.25% 10 (0.09) 37 (0.32) 18 (0.16) 28 (0.24) 10.35 +0.08 (0.27%)
Muhammad Faiz Zulbadli M 28 13 112 74.92% 14 (0.14) 32 (0.32) 17 (0.17) 31 (0.31) 9.46 +0.13 (-0.40%)
Chan Kar Hao M 31 12 117 79.96% 8 (0.08) 29 (0.27) 15 (0.14) 23 (0.22) 10.13 +0.31 (1.80%)
Lee Yik Hoe M 27 12 84 53.23% 3 (0.04) 22 (0.31) 19 (0.27) 22 (0.31) 10.00 +0.98 (10.14%)
Tang Wei Jie M 26 12 82 45.14% 7 (0.12) 20 (0.33) 9 (0.15) 16 (0.27) 9.54 +0.76 (8.47%)
Cheah Yit Weng M 26 12 79 47.29% 7 (0.11) 24 (0.38) 7 (0.11) 14 (0.22) 9.91 +0.94 (11.41%)
Rorie Joyce M 34 9 23 16.63% 2 (0.09) 9 (0.41) 6 (0.27) 8 (0.36) 9.41 +0.41 (4.59%)
Guilherme Godinho M 18 4   2 1.50%   1 (0.50)     4.80 +0.80 (20.00%)
Milivoj Karega M 18 4   1 0.75%         4.80 +0.80 (20.00%)
Amado Molero M 18 3 1 0.75%         3.00 -
Daniel Ariff Tung S 29 12 106 66.68% 27 (0.30) 76 (0.86) 3 (0.03) 30 (0.34) 8.97 -0.04 (-3.13%)
Wong Jian Hua S 32 11 112 70.35% 34 (0.36) 65 (0.69) 9 (0.10) 43 (0.46) 9.85 +0.39 (3.49%)
Ruud Asaimi S 34 9 51 34.19% 15 (0.33) 43 (0.95) 5 (0.11) 20 (0.44) 9.88 +0.88 (9.83%)
Alan Shearer S 23 8 43 20.19% 11 (0.41) 25 (0.93) 1 (0.04) 12 (0.45) 7.72 +0.81 (11.29%)
Raul Murcia S 20 6 16 12.02% 2 (0.12) 2 (0.12) 1 (0.06) 3 (0.19) 4.42 -1.58 (-26.35%)
Rupert Branch S 20 5 4 1.78%   1 (0.42)     6.25 +1.25 (25.00%)
Marvin Williamson S 19 5 6 4.17%   2 (0.36) 1 (0.18) 1 (0.18) 5.32 +0.32 (6.33%)
Ruslan Sorin S 19 5 5 2.74%   1 (0.27)     2.88 -2.12 (-42.40%)
Ernest Rush S 19 4 1 0.75%         4.90 +0.90 (22.50%)
33.95% 154 456 146 300 8.26 + 0.36 ( 4.18%)
  1. Conquerors 3.0 - Los Kurdos (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  2. Los Kurdos - FAITH (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  3. Mancunian Warriors - Los Kurdos (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Los Kurdos - Massive FC (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Crazy Canucks - Los Kurdos (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Los Kurdos - Crazy Canucks (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Massive FC - Los Kurdos (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Los Kurdos - Mancunian Warriors (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. FAITH - Los Kurdos (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Los Kurdos - Conquerors 3.0 (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. FC Porto - Los Kurdos (1 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  12. Los Kurdos - Dynamite United (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Moose Knuckles - Los Kurdos (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  14. Los Kurdos - Town Called Malice (0 - 0) [4-2-4 vs 5-3-2]
  15. Los Kurdos - Massive FC (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  16. Massive FC - Los Kurdos (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-2-4]
  17. Town Called Malice - Los Kurdos (1 - 1) [5-2-3 vs 4-2-4]
  18. Los Kurdos - Moose Knuckles (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  19. Dynamite United - Los Kurdos (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  20. Pastie Munchers FC - FC Porto (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  21. Canucks Utd - Pastie Munchers FC (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  22. Pastie Munchers FC - Hoang Kong FC (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  23. Pastie Munchers FC - Pie Eaters United (1 - 2) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  24. Pastie Munchers FC - Moose Knuckles (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  25. Mean Machine - Pastie Munchers FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  26. Pastie Munchers FC - Chicken Legs (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  27. FAITH - Pastie Munchers FC (0 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  28. Canucks Utd - Pastie Munchers FC (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  29. Pastie Munchers FC - Canucks Utd (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  30. Pastie Munchers FC - FAITH (1 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-3-3]
  31. Chicken Legs - Pastie Munchers FC (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  32. Pastie Munchers FC - Mean Machine (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-4-3]
  33. Moose Knuckles - Pastie Munchers FC (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  34. Canucks Utd - Pastie Munchers FC (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  35. Pastie Munchers FC - Pie Eaters United (1 - 3) [4-2-4 vs 3-5-2]
  36. FAITH - Pastie Munchers FC (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  37. Allstar - Pastie Munchers FC (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  38. Pastie Munchers FC - Elite F.C (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  39. Pastie Munchers FC - Wicky Wanderers (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  40. Pastie Munchers FC - Petters United (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  41. Petters United - Pastie Munchers FC (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  42. Wicky Wanderers - Pastie Munchers FC (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  43. Elite F.C - Pastie Munchers FC (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  44. Pastie Munchers FC - Allstar (4 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  45. Pastie Munchers FC - FAITH (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  46. Pastie Munchers FC - Pie Eaters United (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  47. Pastie Munchers FC - Henthorn Hotshots (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  48. Pastie Munchers FC - Mean Machine (0 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  49. Pastie Munchers FC - Prison Rules (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  50. Crazy Canucks - Pastie Munchers FC (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  51. Canucks Utd - Pastie Munchers FC (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-2-4]
  52. Pastie Munchers FC - Canucks Utd (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  53. Pastie Munchers FC - Crazy Canucks (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  54. Prison Rules - Pastie Munchers FC (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  55. Mean Machine - Pastie Munchers FC (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  56. Henthorn Hotshots - Pastie Munchers FC (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  57. Pie Eaters United - Pastie Munchers FC (2 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  58. Pastie Munchers FC - Pie Eaters United (1 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  59. Ma Lin Boyz - Pastie Munchers FC (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  60. Pastie Munchers FC - Prison Rules (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  61. FC Porto - Pastie Munchers FC (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  62. Pastie Munchers FC - Town Called Malice (1 - 5) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  63. Northampton Town FC - Pastie Munchers FC (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  64. Forza Azzurri - Pastie Munchers FC (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  65. Pastie Munchers FC - Forza Azzurri (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  66. Pastie Munchers FC - Northampton Town FC (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  67. Town Called Malice - FC Daninator (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  68. FC Daninator - FC Porto (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  69. Prison Rules - FC Daninator (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  70. Town Called Malice - FC Daninator (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  71. Maestros of Marcus - FC Daninator (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  72. FC Daninator - Mean Machine (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  73. FC Daninator - Clockwork Oranje (1 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  74. FC Daninator - MC Stradale (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  75. MC Stradale - FC Daninator (4 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  76. Clockwork Oranje - FC Daninator (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  77. Mean Machine - FC Daninator (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  78. FC Daninator - Maestros of Marcus (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  79. FC Daninator - Town Called Malice (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  80. Henthorn Hotshots - FC Daninator (0 - 3) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  81. FC Daninator - Town Called Malice (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  82. Chicken Legs - FC Daninator (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  83. FC Daninator - Conquerors 3.0 (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  84. Ma Lin Boyz - FC Daninator (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  85. Fo1Tboyys Reserve - FC Daninator (1 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  86. FC Daninator - Fo1Tboyys Reserve (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  87. FC Daninator - Ma Lin Boyz (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  88. Conquerors 3.0 - FC Daninator (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  89. FC Daninator - Chicken Legs (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  90. Town Called Malice - FC Daninator (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  91. Clockwork Oranje - FC Daninator (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  92. FC Daninator - Hat Trick FC (1 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  93. FC Daninator - Pie Eaters United (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  94. FC Daninator - Conquerors 3.0 (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  95. SL Benfica - FC Daninator (1 - 4) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  96. Northen Bois - FC Daninator (4 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  97. FC Daninator - Northen Bois (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  98. FC Daninator - SL Benfica (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  99. Conquerors 3.0 - FC Daninator (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  100. Pie Eaters United - FC Daninator (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  101. Hat Trick FC - FC Daninator (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  102. Conquerors 3.0 - FC Daninator (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  103. Clockwork Oranje - FC Daninator (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  104. FC Daninator - FC Porto (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  105. FC Daninator - Forza Azzurri (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  106. FC Daninator - Mean Machine (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  107. Mean Machine - FC Daninator (2 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  108. Forza Azzurri - FC Daninator (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  109. FC Porto - FC Daninator (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  110. FC Daninator - Clockwork Oranje (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  111. FC Daninator - Conquerors 3.0 (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  112. Mean Machine - FC Daninator (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  113. Canucks Utd - FC Daninator (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  114. FC Daninator - Conundra (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  115. FC Daninator - Carlisle Knights (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  116. FC Daninator - Pie Eaters United (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  117. Pie Eaters United - FC Daninator (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  118. Carlisle Knights - FC Daninator (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  119. Conundra - FC Daninator (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  120. FC Daninator - Canucks Utd (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  121. FC Daninator - Mean Machine (4 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  122. Ma Lin Boyz - FC Daninator (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  123. Carlisle Knights - FC Daninator (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  124. Conquerors 3.0 - FC Daninator (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  125. FC Daninator - MC Stradale (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  126. FC Daninator - Ma Lin Boyz (3 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  127. FC Daninator - Substandard Liege (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  128. Substandard Liege - FC Daninator (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  129. Ma Lin Boyz - FC Daninator (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  130. MC Stradale - FC Daninator (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  131. FC Daninator - Conquerors 3.0 (1 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  132. FC Daninator - Carlisle Knights (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top