<

Overview :: Battling Mariners

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Hanns Steele II K 33 12 66 56.75% 2 (0.03) 2 (0.03)   2 (0.03) 12.48 +0.48 (3.99%)
Hanns Steele K 29 9 28 24.23% 1 (0.04) 1 (0.04)   1 (0.04) 9.15 +0.15 (1.63%)
Chris Woods K 21 7 16 13.84%         6.33 +0.57 (11.00%)
David Attenborough K 36 6 2 1.73%         5.00 -1.00 (-16.67%)
Dave Boylen D 27 11 105 85.75% 4 (0.04) 12 (0.12) 16 (0.16) 20 (0.20) 10.55 +1.72 (19.07%)
Igor Hammer D 23 11 94 72.77% 1 (0.01) 6 (0.07) 1 (0.01) 2 (0.02) 9.52 +1.72 (21.70%)
Paul Groves D 33 11 105 84.99% 6 (0.06) 9 (0.09) 13 (0.13) 19 (0.19) 12.07 +1.95 (19.11%)
Connor Nails D 29 10 10 7.82% 2 (0.22) 3 (0.33) 2 (0.22) 4 (0.44) 10.17 +0.17 (1.70%)
Tuffers Nails D 30 9 21 16.95% 2 (0.10) 3 (0.15) 2 (0.10) 4 (0.20) 10.65 +2.08 (24.60%)
Golden Oldie Man D 33 8 6 4.15% 2 (0.42) 2 (0.42)   2 (0.42) 8.50 +0.50 (6.25%)
Darran Kempson D 19 8 44 25.87%   2 (0.07) 1 (0.03) 1 (0.03) 6.68 +0.75 (12.44%)
John Woodgate D 33 8 4 3.07%   1 (0.28)     7.23 -0.77 (-9.69%)
Jack O’Trades D 34 7 9 7.79%   1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 6.90 -0.10 (-1.43%)
Jay Buck D 19 6 52 26.38%   1 (0.03)     3.78 -0.01 (1.06%)
Iain Ward D 21 6 11 7.92%         6.59 +0.59 (9.85%)
Tyson Bruno D 17 4   1 0.29%         4.00 -
Steve Painter D 18 4 13 9.74%     1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 4.42 +1.12 (35.51%)
Juninho Pernambucano M 32 13 47 39.80% 25 (0.54) 43 (0.93) 19 (0.41) 44 (0.96) 12.83 +0.19 (1.62%)
John Oster M 24 13 106 90.07% 26 (0.25) 53 (0.51) 14 (0.13) 40 (0.38) 12.10 +1.65 (16.04%)
Peter Sweeney M 34 10 82 59.34% 21 (0.31) 62 (0.90) 15 (0.22) 36 (0.52) 11.02 +1.02 (10.20%)
Michael Coulson M 22 10 87 64.49% 7 (0.09) 24 (0.32) 9 (0.12) 16 (0.21) 8.64 +1.22 (18.20%)
Nobby Charlton M 22 9 59 41.18% 5 (0.11) 17 (0.36) 17 (0.36) 22 (0.46) 7.65 +0.82 (14.43%)
Kingsley Black M 34 9 48 38.87% 19 (0.42) 63 (1.40) 17 (0.38) 36 (0.80) 10.61 +1.61 (17.87%)
Lloyd Sharpe M 27 8 15 12.98% 5 (0.33) 13 (0.87) 5 (0.33) 10 (0.67) 9.81 +1.81 (22.67%)
Jack Rodwell M 23 8 86 70.31% 13 (0.16) 28 (0.34) 13 (0.16) 26 (0.32) 8.81 -0.08 (0.99%)
Rummy Horsefield M 19 6 30 17.46% 2 (0.10) 7 (0.35) 3 (0.15) 5 (0.25) 5.57 +0.87 (18.50%)
Hendrix Horsefield M 19 6 34 20.60% 2 (0.08) 5 (0.21) 2 (0.08) 4 (0.17) 5.35 +0.62 (13.48%)
Maverick Greed M 18 5 21 13.19% 1 (0.07) 2 (0.13)   1 (0.07) 4.95 +0.62 (13.81%)
Michael Groves M 19 5 32 25.83% 4 (0.13) 11 (0.37) 7 (0.23) 11 (0.37) 4.67 +0.35 (11.88%)
Robbie Eagle M 18 4 43 33.22% 3 (0.08) 6 (0.16) 3 (0.08) 6 (0.16) 4.79 +0.02 (3.60%)
Anthony Church M 17 4 12 6.59%     1 (0.13) 1 (0.13) 5.02 +1.03 (25.62%)
Teddy Sheringham S 31 11 47 36.83% 18 (0.42) 44 (1.03) 4 (0.09) 22 (0.52) 11.70 +1.09 (10.21%)
Clive Mendonca S 33 10 37 29.65% 12 (0.35) 37 (1.08) 7 (0.20) 19 (0.55) 11.22 +0.79 (7.86%)
Liam Hearn S 20 8 58 34.46% 15 (0.38) 33 (0.83) 3 (0.08) 18 (0.45) 6.38 +0.88 (16.82%)
Bjorn Bergkamp S 33 8 15 12.58% 4 (0.28) 11 (0.76) 2 (0.14) 6 (0.41) 9.29 +0.55 (6.84%)
Jack Lester S 22 7 35 24.33% 8 (0.28) 26 (0.92) 2 (0.07) 10 (0.36) 7.47 +0.76 (11.55%)
Robbie Fowler S 20 7 31 24.68% 9 (0.32) 22 (0.77) 3 (0.11) 12 (0.42) 6.37 +0.60 (11.54%)
Elroy Woolery S 20 6 17 8.43% 3 (0.31) 9 (0.92) 1 (0.10) 4 (0.41) 6.47 +1.06 (19.61%)
Gabriel Batistuta S 16 3 3 1.48%         3.67 +0.67 (22.22%)
Christopher Furlong S 17 3 2 0.96%         2.45 -0.55 (-18.33%)
28.93% 222 559 184 406 7.77 + 0.71 (10.70%)
  1. Battling Mariners - Barming FC (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Battling Mariners - Shoplifters OTW Utd (1 - 0) [5-2-3 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Ipswich Town F.C. - Battling Mariners (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-2-4]
  4. Battling Mariners - Stoney Lads Club (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Battling Mariners - Olympic Sprinters (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  6. Battling Mariners - FC Inter Breeding (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Battling Mariners - Newcastle United (3 - 5) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Tokushima Vortis - Battling Mariners (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  9. Class Act - Battling Mariners (3 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Unbelievable Tekkers FC - Battling Mariners (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Battling Mariners - Class Act (6 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  12. FC Internazionale - Battling Mariners (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Battling Mariners - Tokushima Vortis (2 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 5-3-2]
  14. Newcastle United - Battling Mariners (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 5-4-1]
  15. FC Inter Breeding - Battling Mariners (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Olympic Sprinters - Battling Mariners (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  17. Battling Mariners - Ipswich Town F.C. (4 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Barming FC - Battling Mariners (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  19. BarcaLlandudno - Battling Mariners (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  20. Battling Mariners - Ipswich Town F.C. (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  21. Barming FC - Battling Mariners (1 - 2) [4-2-4 vs 3-5-2]
  22. Fitton Hill Rangers - Battling Mariners (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 3-4-3]
  23. Battling Mariners - Tokushima Vortis (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  24. Battling Mariners - Balls Deep (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  25. Battling Mariners - C.S. Strollers (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  26. Swindon Town - Battling Mariners (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  27. Battling Mariners - Bear Grylls Piss (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  28. Lazio - Battling Mariners (0 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  29. Unbelievable Tekkers FC - Battling Mariners (0 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  30. Battling Mariners - Unbelievable Tekkers FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  31. Battling Mariners - Lazio (6 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  32. Battling Mariners - The Joblessed (3 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  33. Bear Grylls Piss - Battling Mariners (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  34. Battling Mariners - tldr (5 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  35. C.S. Strollers - Battling Mariners (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  36. Shoplifters OTW Utd - Battling Mariners (0 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 3-4-3]
  37. Tokushima Vortis - Battling Mariners (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  38. Battling Mariners - Esquadrão de Ouro (1 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  39. Battling Mariners - Barming FC (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-2-3]
  40. Battling Mariners - Fitton Hill Rangers (0 - 3) [5-2-3 vs 4-5-1]
  41. Ipswich Town F.C. - Battling Mariners (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  42. Olympic Sprinters - Battling Mariners (3 - 5) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  43. Marc - Battling Mariners (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  44. Olympic Sprinters - Battling Mariners (0 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  45. Battling Mariners - Balls Deep (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  46. Battling Mariners - Denzil Athletic (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  47. Shoplifters OTW Utd - Battling Mariners (3 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  48. Rapid Manor - Battling Mariners (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  49. Battling Mariners - C.S. Strollers (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  50. Battling Mariners - Olympic Sprinters (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  51. Eskilsminne IF - Battling Mariners (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  52. Aston Villains - Battling Mariners (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 5-4-1]
  53. Battling Mariners - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  54. Waterloo Warriors - Battling Mariners (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  55. Battling Mariners - FC Internazionale (0 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  56. Battling Mariners - Aston Villains (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  57. Battling Mariners - Eskilsminne IF (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  58. Olympic Sprinters - Battling Mariners (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  59. C.S. Strollers - Battling Mariners (1 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  60. Battling Mariners - Shoplifters OTW Utd (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  61. Balls Deep - Battling Mariners (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  62. Battling Mariners - Tokushima Vortis (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  63. Manchester City - Battling Mariners (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  64. Battling Mariners - Newcastle United (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  65. Battling Mariners - Shoplifters OTW Utd (5 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  66. Battling Mariners - Stoney Lads Club (0 - 4) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  67. Battling Mariners - Bear Grylls Piss (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  68. Battling Mariners - Eskilsminne IF (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  69. Waterloo Warriors - Battling Mariners (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  70. Balls Deep - Battling Mariners (2 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  71. Battling Mariners - Balls Deep (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  72. Battling Mariners - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  73. Battling Mariners - A.C. Cesena (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  74. Eskilsminne IF - Battling Mariners (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  75. Battling Mariners - Marc (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  76. Bear Grylls Piss - Battling Mariners (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  77. Stoke Defiers - Battling Mariners (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  78. Shoplifters OTW Utd - Battling Mariners (0 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  79. Battling Mariners - Manchester City (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  80. Tokushima Vortis - Battling Mariners (2 - 5) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  81. Battling Mariners - Olympic Sprinters (2 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  82. Looney Pwns FC - Battling Mariners (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 5-4-1]
  83. Fitton Hill Rangers - Battling Mariners (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  84. Battling Mariners - Manchester United (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  85. Battling Mariners - Digital Fortress (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  86. Waterloo Warriors - Battling Mariners (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  87. Cleveland Steamers - Battling Mariners (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  88. Looney Pwns FC - Battling Mariners (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  89. Battling Mariners - Manchester City (6 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  90. Battling Mariners - Rapid Manor (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  91. Battling Mariners - Aberdeen Allstars (1 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  92. Battling Mariners - Bengal Barbarians (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  93. Manchester Devils - Battling Mariners (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  94. Battling Mariners - Manchester Devils (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  95. Bengal Barbarians - Battling Mariners (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  96. Battling Mariners - Bengal Barbarians (6 - 5) [5-3-2 vs 5-4-1]
  97. Rapid Manor - Battling Mariners (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  98. Olympic Sprinters - Battling Mariners (3 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  99. Battling Mariners - Looney Pwns FC (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  100. Battling Mariners - Looney Pwns FC (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  101. Battling Mariners - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  102. Battling Mariners - Swindon Town (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  103. Manchester United - Battling Mariners (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  104. Battling Mariners - Fitton Hill Rangers (0 - 5) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  105. Looney Pwns FC - Battling Mariners (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  106. Fighting Falcons - Battling Mariners (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  107. Battling Mariners - Marc (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  108. Nadheva - Battling Mariners (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  109. Olympic Sprinters - Battling Mariners (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  110. Halifax Town - Battling Mariners (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  111. Manchester City - Battling Mariners (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  112. Battling Mariners - Olympic Sprinters (2 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  113. Battling Mariners - Rapid Manor (1 - 7) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top