<

Overview :: Waterloo Warriors

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Jon Tottenham K 22 8 14 73.10%         9.71 +1.71 (21.43%)
Alessandro Colavecchio K 29 8 5 26.11%         9.18 +1.18 (14.75%)
Sunny Sandhu D 27 12 18 93.53%     2 (0.11) 2 (0.11) 13.37 +1.37 (11.44%)
Joel Depooter D 23 10 16 83.54% 3 (0.19) 4 (0.25)   3 (0.19) 10.81 +1.74 (19.39%)
Jeff Dineley D 23 9 12 61.80%         8.78 +0.69 (8.77%)
Jason Swamy D 24 9 13 60.27%         10.87 +1.87 (20.77%)
Edwin Woghiren D 20 7 12 55.90%   1 (0.09)     6.68 +0.60 (10.10%)
Nick Giles M 30 11 17 80.70% 5 (0.32) 16 (1.04) 3 (0.19) 8 (0.52) 10.01 -0.99 (-9.04%)
Mark Yolkowski M 24 8 8 34.90% 2 (0.30) 3 (0.45) 1 (0.15) 3 (0.45) 7.41 -0.59 (-7.34%)
Spico Reano M 23 8 15 73.72%     2 (0.14) 2 (0.14) 8.02 +0.02 (0.25%)
Angelo Nero M 23 7 12 50.11% 2 (0.21) 4 (0.42) 1 (0.10) 3 (0.31) 7.48 +0.47 (6.79%)
Alex Bittermann M 22 7 14 69.18% 1 (0.08) 5 (0.38) 2 (0.15) 3 (0.23) 8.16 +1.16 (16.53%)
Trini Pierre M 21 7 10 50.74% 2 (0.21) 3 (0.31) 1 (0.10) 3 (0.31) 8.13 +1.13 (16.14%)
Adrian Dewhurst M 20 6 7 32.80%     1 (0.16) 1 (0.16) 5.01 -0.13 (-1.62%)
Paul Longo M 18 5 7 36.04% 1 (0.14) 3 (0.43) 1 (0.14) 2 (0.29) 6.93 +1.93 (38.57%)
Steve Tully M 18 4 4 20.89%   1 (0.25)     4.75 +0.75 (18.75%)
Quingua Yang S 26 10 16 83.54% 11 (0.69) 21 (1.31) 1 (0.06) 12 (0.75) 10.84 +0.84 (8.44%)
Sean Opaski S 22 8 10 52.21% 2 (0.20) 3 (0.30) 2 (0.20) 4 (0.40) 8.51 +0.51 (6.38%)
Mister Gideon S 23 7 9 46.99% 1 (0.11) 7 (0.78)   1 (0.11) 7.63 +0.63 (9.05%)
57.16% 30 71 17 47 8.54 + 0.78 (11.03%)
  1. Manchester City - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Waterloo Warriors - C.S. Strollers (5 - 6) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Waterloo Warriors - Eskilsminne IF (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Waterloo Warriors - Team Wolfman (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  5. Lazio - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Waterloo Warriors - Esquadrão de Ouro (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  7. Romanian Talents - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Waterloo Warriors - Balls Deep (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Olympic Sprinters - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 2) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Balls Deep - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Waterloo Warriors - C.S. Strollers (6 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Waterloo Warriors - Romanian Talents (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Balls Deep - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Esquadrão de Ouro - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. Swindon Town - Waterloo Warriors (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  16. Waterloo Warriors - Lazio (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Team Wolfman - Waterloo Warriors (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  18. Eskilsminne IF - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  19. Waterloo Warriors - Manchester City (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top