<

Overview :: Polished Chromium

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Chuck Liddell K 29 7 4 24.73%         5.72 -1.27 (-18.21%)
Sandro Espírito K 19 4 11 68.01%         2.63 -1.37 (-34.32%)
Frankie Edgar D 18 6 16 96.77% 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.13) 4.83 -0.24 (-4.52%)
Josh Koscheck D 27 6 15 92.74% 1 (0.07) 2 (0.13)   1 (0.07) 5.37 -0.63 (-10.56%)
Gearalt Hayes D 27 5 16 98.92%         4.56 -0.44 (-8.88%)
Connor Coyle D 25 5 12 59.34%         2.40 -2.60 (-52.00%)
Julian Kielty D 28 5 9 49.53% 1 (0.12) 1 (0.12)   1 (0.12) 5.57 +0.57 (11.33%)
Johnnie Bailey M 26 8 2 12.37%   2 (1.00)     6.00 -2.00 (-25.00%)
Peter Kauniainen M 28 7 2 12.37% 1 (0.50) 1 (0.50)   1 (0.50) 5.85 -1.15 (-16.43%)
Carl Pearce M 24 5 16 95.16%   1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 4.09 -0.91 (-18.12%)
Richard Dunn M 18 5 13 80.38%   2 (0.15)     3.93 -0.15 (-3.58%)
Anraí Thorsteinsson M 25 5 15 92.74% 2 (0.13) 3 (0.20) 1 (0.07) 3 (0.20) 5.11 +0.11 (2.27%)
Luke Cadogan M 21 4 13 76.34%         3.32 -0.68 (-17.12%)
Steven Whyte S 30 7 8 47.11% 2 (0.26) 3 (0.39) 1 (0.13) 3 (0.39) 5.15 -1.85 (-26.43%)
Jerry Mourne S 20 5 12 74.19%   4 (0.33) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 4.69 -0.31 (-6.17%)
Scott Melvin S 20 5 3 18.55%   3 (1.00)     5.07 +0.07 (1.33%)
Finbar Lunny S 24 5 1 6.18%         3.70 -1.30 (-26.00%)
Braden Thoor S 18 3 12 70.36% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09)   1 (0.09) 1.73 -1.27 (-42.22%)
59.77% 9 24 5 14 4.43 -0.86 (-16.37%)
  1. Pathetic Athletic - Polished Chromium (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Polished Chromium - tldr (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  3. Polished Chromium - Fitton Hill Rangers (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Dezvirgineaza-ma - Polished Chromium (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Diablo Bleu - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Polished Chromium - Uppen Atoms (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Polished Chromium - Glasgow Sambas (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Deportivo Wanka - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Polished Chromium - Deportivo Wanka (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Nac MacFeegles - Polished Chromium (5 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Glasgow Sambas - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Uppen Atoms - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Polished Chromium - Diablo Bleu (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Polished Chromium - Dezvirgineaza-ma (2 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  15. tldr - Polished Chromium (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Polished Chromium - Pathetic Athletic (2 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top