<

Overview :: Olympic Sprinters

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Carlo Esposito K 25 10 2 10.32%         10.50 +0.50 (5.00%)
Salvo Napolitano K 18 4 4 20.64%         3.98 -0.02 (-0.62%)
Gregory Banes K 18 4 12 61.92%         4.47 +0.47 (11.87%)
Gianni Farfaglia D 28 10 16 74.14% 1 (0.07) 1 (0.07)   1 (0.07) 11.68 +1.68 (16.75%)
Aleksandar Jaconelli D 26 10 17 86.20% 3 (0.18) 3 (0.18) 1 (0.06) 4 (0.24) 11.57 +1.57 (15.71%)
Gloria de Hippo D 32 8 10 47.28%     1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 9.52 +1.52 (19.00%)
Garry McDonell D 20 7 10 51.60%         7.93 +0.93 (13.29%)
Darius Ryder D 19 6 11 47.11%     1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 7.15 +1.15 (19.09%)
Massimo Caruso D 19 6 8 34.77%   3 (0.45)     6.59 +0.59 (9.79%)
Svenne Rubarth D 19 5 12 57.32%         6.33 +1.33 (26.67%)
Taddio Mina M 31 9 18 87.83% 4 (0.23) 8 (0.47) 3 (0.18) 7 (0.41) 9.71 +0.71 (7.84%)
Abelino Greco M 27 9 15 73.36% 1 (0.07) 4 (0.28) 6 (0.42) 7 (0.49) 9.71 +0.71 (7.85%)
Nico Monterastelli M 21 8 11 56.76% 4 (0.36) 9 (0.82) 2 (0.18) 6 (0.55) 9.17 +1.17 (14.66%)
Salvatore Luppino M 33 8 12 60.68% 1 (0.09) 5 (0.43) 5 (0.43) 6 (0.51) 9.65 +1.65 (20.62%)
Rupert Palladini M 20 5 12 58.27% 4 (0.35) 5 (0.44) 2 (0.18) 6 (0.53) 6.71 +1.71 (34.17%)
Cesare Montella M 20 5 9 43.86%   2 (0.24) 1 (0.12) 1 (0.12) 6.38 +1.38 (27.56%)
Tomas Pestrin M 19 4 7 26.86% 1 (0.19) 4 (0.77) 1 (0.19) 2 (0.38) 5.14 +1.14 (28.57%)
Mario Luigi S 28 9 2 10.32% 2 (1.00) 5 (2.50)   2 (1.00) 8.30 -0.70 (-7.78%)
Evelyn Peverelli S 28 8 15 74.82% 7 (0.48) 18 (1.24) 1 (0.07) 8 (0.55) 9.66 +1.66 (20.75%)
Willy Antonio Perdomo S 18 4 9 45.32% 3 (0.34) 5 (0.57) 1 (0.11) 4 (0.46) 4.62 +0.62 (15.56%)
Fedro Moretti S 18 4 8 38.70% 4 (0.53) 7 (0.93) 2 (0.27) 6 (0.80) 5.24 +1.24 (30.94%)
50.86% 35 79 27 62 7.81 + 1.00 (16.06%)
  1. Aston Villains - Olympic Sprinters (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  2. Olympic Sprinters - Waterloo Warriors (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Olympic Sprinters - Nac MacFeegles (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Newcastle United - Olympic Sprinters (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  5. Olympic Sprinters - Esquadrão de Ouro (0 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Eskilsminne IF - Olympic Sprinters (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. Olympic Sprinters - Manchester City (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  8. Olympic Sprinters - Tranmere Rovers (6 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Esquadrão de Ouro - Olympic Sprinters (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Olympic Sprinters - Esquadrão de Ouro (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Tranmere Rovers - Olympic Sprinters (0 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Handsome Gang United - Olympic Sprinters (5 - 7) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  13. Manchester City - Olympic Sprinters (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Aston Villains - Olympic Sprinters (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  15. Olympic Sprinters - Eskilsminne IF (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  16. Olympic Sprinters - Newcastle United (2 - 4) [5-3-2 vs 4-3-3]
  17. Looney Pwns FC - Olympic Sprinters (2 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Waterloo Warriors - Olympic Sprinters (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  19. Olympic Sprinters - Aston Villains (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top