<

Overview :: Barming FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Darryl Woolery K 32 9 18 70.54% 3 (0.17) 3 (0.17) 1 (0.06) 4 (0.23) 12.22 +3.22 (35.74%)
Matias Amado K 19 6 7 21.76%         6.46 +0.46 (7.62%)
Julien Vassell D 27 9 23 90.56% 3 (0.13) 3 (0.13) 4 (0.18) 7 (0.31) 11.40 +2.40 (26.67%)
Parker Tuttle D 28 8 21 84.07% 1 (0.05) 1 (0.05) 3 (0.14) 4 (0.19) 11.28 +3.28 (41.01%)
Otis Lea D 27 8 19 73.06% 2 (0.11) 3 (0.16)   2 (0.11) 10.29 +2.29 (28.62%)
Chesley Milner D 19 5 15 44.52% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09)   1 (0.09) 6.20 +1.20 (24.00%)
Ralph Kjellberg D 18 4 11 37.34%     1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 4.84 +0.84 (20.91%)
Fraser Chapman D 17 3 11 38.29%         4.35 +1.35 (45.15%)
Arthur Stockdale M 29 10 18 70.15% 4 (0.23) 7 (0.40) 4 (0.23) 8 (0.46) 9.57 -0.43 (-4.28%)
Iain Myer M 19 5 16 53.61% 1 (0.07) 5 (0.37) 3 (0.22) 4 (0.30) 6.34 +1.34 (26.75%)
Julian Mewa M 18 4 9 36.07%   1 (0.11) 3 (0.33) 3 (0.33) 4.94 +0.94 (23.61%)
Katsuo Chikamatsu M 18 4 9 28.20%   1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 4.31 +0.31 (7.78%)
Frankie Dunn M 18 4 9 28.94%         3.98 -0.02 (-0.56%)
David Leitão M 18 4 8 28.55%         5.41 +1.41 (35.31%)
Carl Lees M 18 4 11 37.99% 1 (0.11) 1 (0.11)   1 (0.11) 5.39 +1.39 (34.77%)
Titus Vickerman S 31 8 20 72.19% 8 (0.44) 12 (0.67) 4 (0.22) 12 (0.67) 9.25 +1.25 (15.69%)
Marat Bukhvostov S 34 7 20 76.85% 10 (0.52) 19 (0.99) 3 (0.16) 13 (0.68) 8.57 +1.57 (22.43%)
Cecil Bailey S 21 6 15 50.96% 2 (0.16) 7 (0.55) 1 (0.08) 3 (0.24) 7.35 +1.35 (22.44%)
Billy McRichter S 20 6 16 57.31% 5 (0.35) 18 (1.26)   5 (0.35) 7.63 +1.63 (27.19%)
52.68% 41 82 28 69 7.36 + 1.36 (23.20%)
  1. Tokushima Vortis - Barming FC (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  2. Barming FC - Battling Mariners (1 - 2) [4-2-4 vs 3-5-2]
  3. Barming FC - The Magpies (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Barming FC - Bear Grylls Piss (1 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-3-3]
  5. Rapid Manor - Barming FC (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-2-4]
  6. Lazio - Barming FC (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  7. Barming FC - Downing College AFC (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  8. Barming FC - Unbelievable Tekkers FC (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Barming FC - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Ipswich Town F.C. - Barming FC (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  11. Swindon Town - Barming FC (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  12. Barming FC - C.S. Strollers (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  13. C.S. Strollers - Barming FC (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  14. Barming FC - Ipswich Town F.C. (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  15. Barming FC - Dezvirgineaza-ma (3 - 2) [4-2-4 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Unbelievable Tekkers FC - Barming FC (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 5-2-3]
  17. Manchester United - Barming FC (3 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 5-2-3]
  18. Barming FC - Lazio (5 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  19. Lisbon Lions - Barming FC (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 5-2-3]
  20. Bear Grylls Piss - Barming FC (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 3-4-3]
  21. Stoney Lads Club - Barming FC (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  22. Battling Mariners - Barming FC (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-2-3]
  23. Barming FC - Tokushima Vortis (1 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top