<

Overview :: Polished Chromium

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Chuck Liddell K 29 7 11 57.76%         8.10 +1.10 (15.71%)
Gabriel Huntington K 18 5 8 42.01%         4.12 -0.88 (-17.50%)
Mel Pepper D 30 9 13 65.64% 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 3 (0.24) 4 (0.32) 10.06 +1.06 (11.79%)
Josh Koscheck D 27 6 17 89.27% 1 (0.06) 3 (0.18)   1 (0.06) 6.85 +0.85 (14.12%)
Frankie Edgar D 18 6 18 94.52%         6.44 +0.44 (7.31%)
Julian Kielty D 29 6 14 69.75%   1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 7.51 +1.51 (25.12%)
Gearalt Hayes D 27 5 9 43.15%     1 (0.12) 1 (0.12) 5.47 +0.47 (9.33%)
Connor Coyle D 25 5 5 26.26%     1 (0.20) 1 (0.20) 3.30 -1.70 (-34.00%)
Johnnie Bailey M 26 8 17 86.87% 3 (0.18) 9 (0.54) 1 (0.06) 4 (0.24) 6.49 -1.51 (-18.90%)
Peter Kauniainen M 28 7 19 99.77% 3 (0.16) 9 (0.47) 3 (0.16) 6 (0.32) 6.53 -0.47 (-6.69%)
Anraí Thorsteinsson M 26 6 9 42.69% 1 (0.12) 4 (0.49) 2 (0.25) 3 (0.37) 6.81 +0.81 (13.52%)
Richard Dunn M 18 5 17 85.27% 3 (0.18) 6 (0.37) 4 (0.25) 7 (0.43) 5.55 +0.55 (10.94%)
Carl Pearce M 24 5 10 47.03% 2 (0.22) 4 (0.45) 1 (0.11) 3 (0.33) 5.71 +0.71 (14.20%)
Luke Cadogan M 22 5 1 5.25%         5.70 +0.70 (14.00%)
Gerson Laabi M 17 4 10 47.95% 2 (0.22) 3 (0.33) 3 (0.33) 5 (0.55) 4.90 +0.90 (22.50%)
Steven Whyte S 30 7 15 76.94% 4 (0.27) 15 (1.02) 2 (0.14) 6 (0.41) 6.99 -0.01 (-0.19%)
Jerry Mourne S 21 6 8 36.76% 3 (0.43) 7 (1.00) 1 (0.14) 4 (0.57) 6.67 +0.68 (11.25%)
Scott Melvin S 20 5 7 33.28% 2 (0.32) 7 (1.10)   2 (0.32) 4.83 -0.17 (-3.43%)
Habib Remch S 16 4 11 47.32% 2 (0.22) 7 (0.78) 3 (0.33) 5 (0.55) 4.52 +0.52 (12.95%)
57.76% 27 76 26 53 6.13 + 0.29 ( 5.37%)
  1. Fitton Hill Rangers - Polished Chromium (6 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Jayjays Amateurs - Polished Chromium (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Polished Chromium - Dezvirgineaza-ma (1 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. Polished Chromium - Glasgow Sambas (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. XE Xperimental - Polished Chromium (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Uppen Atoms - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Polished Chromium - Diablo Bleu (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  8. Polished Chromium - Russia Privjet (3 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Polished Chromium - Legends of Sports (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Deportivo Wanka - Polished Chromium (2 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Polished Chromium - Jambos Jokers (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Polished Chromium - Deportivo Wanka (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Legends of Sports - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Nordic Dragons - Polished Chromium (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. Diablo Bleu - Polished Chromium (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Polished Chromium - Manchester Utd 19 Times (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Polished Chromium - XE Xperimental (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  18. Dezvirgineaza-ma - Polished Chromium (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  19. Polished Chromium - Denzil Athletic (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top