<

Overview :: Waterloo Warriors

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Jon Tottenham K 25 11 12 65.99%         11.63 +1.55 (15.42%)
Alessandro Colavecchio K 30 9 6 32.99%         9.17 +0.17 (1.85%)
Sunny Sandhu D 30 13 17 93.07% 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06)   1 (0.06) 15.82 +2.82 (21.72%)
Joel Depooter D 25 11 13 61.27% 2 (0.18) 3 (0.27) 1 (0.09) 3 (0.27) 13.70 +2.70 (24.55%)
Jason Swamy D 27 11 13 58.88%   1 (0.09) 2 (0.19) 2 (0.19) 12.24 +2.16 (21.55%)
Jeff Dineley D 25 10 15 71.61% 1 (0.08) 2 (0.15) 1 (0.08) 2 (0.15) 11.55 +1.55 (15.53%)
Edwin Woghiren D 21 8 12 54.99%     2 (0.20) 2 (0.20) 9.25 +1.25 (15.63%)
Nick Giles M 32 12 17 85.36% 8 (0.52) 17 (1.10) 2 (0.13) 10 (0.64) 12.07 +0.07 (0.59%)
Alex Bittermann M 25 10 18 84.34% 1 (0.07) 4 (0.26) 3 (0.20) 4 (0.26) 11.02 +1.96 (21.91%)
Spico Reano M 25 10 15 72.74% 3 (0.23) 5 (0.38)   3 (0.23) 11.29 +2.23 (24.74%)
Angelo Nero M 26 9 14 51.11% 3 (0.32) 5 (0.54) 1 (0.11) 4 (0.43) 9.42 +1.35 (16.88%)
Trini Pierre M 24 9 17 61.57% 1 (0.09) 5 (0.45) 4 (0.36) 5 (0.45) 9.45 +1.39 (17.43%)
Paul Longo M 20 7 13 56.78% 1 (0.10) 3 (0.29) 1 (0.10) 2 (0.19) 8.75 +1.75 (24.95%)
Steve Tully M 19 5 10 32.10%         5.82 +0.82 (16.40%)
Quingua Yang S 29 11 14 64.14% 8 (0.69) 16 (1.37) 1 (0.09) 9 (0.77) 11.61 +0.61 (5.58%)
Sean Opaski S 24 10 15 63.54% 2 (0.17) 8 (0.69) 1 (0.09) 3 (0.26) 9.86 +0.79 (8.81%)
Mister Gideon S 25 9 14 48.42%   2 (0.23) 2 (0.23) 2 (0.23) 9.89 +0.89 (9.84%)
Morgan Mahabir S 18 6 9 30.19%   6 (1.09)     5.27 +0.16 (3.85%)
60.51% 31 78 21 52 10.43 + 1.35 (14.85%)
  1. Waterloo Warriors - Olympic Sprinters (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Snygging United - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  3. Eskilsminne IF - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. Swindon Town - Waterloo Warriors (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Waterloo Warriors - Aston Villains (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  6. Waterloo Warriors - C.S. Strollers (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Waterloo Warriors - Balls Deep (2 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  8. Shoplifters OTW Utd - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Battling Mariners - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Waterloo Warriors - Battling Mariners (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Waterloo Warriors - Shoplifters OTW Utd (4 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-2-3]
  12. Green Bay Packers - Waterloo Warriors (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. Balls Deep - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  14. C.S. Strollers - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  15. Manchester Devils - Waterloo Warriors (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  16. Manchester Devils - Waterloo Warriors (2 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  17. Waterloo Warriors - Eskilsminne IF (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Olympic Sprinters - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top