<

Overview :: Barming FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Darryl Woolery K 33 9 13 60.50% 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 2 (0.15) 10.71 +1.71 (18.97%)
Matias Amado K 21 8 9 41.88%         7.07 -0.04 (-0.63%)
Julien Vassell D 29 10 20 84.07% 2 (0.11) 2 (0.11) 1 (0.06) 3 (0.17) 11.95 +1.95 (19.50%)
Parker Tuttle D 30 9 19 82.75% 2 (0.11) 3 (0.17) 2 (0.11) 4 (0.22) 11.44 +2.44 (27.13%)
Otis Lea D 28 9 16 65.55%   1 (0.07)     11.05 +2.05 (22.78%)
Ralph Kjellberg D 20 6 12 47.55%   3 (0.29) 1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 6.35 +1.27 (25.06%)
Chesley Milner D 20 6 13 49.82%   1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 7.55 +1.55 (25.77%)
Otelo Macedo D 18 4 10 36.72%         5.70 +1.70 (42.50%)
Fraser Chapman D 18 4 11 37.28%   1 (0.12) 2 (0.25) 2 (0.25) 5.78 +1.78 (44.55%)
Arthur Stockdale M 31 10 17 76.58% 5 (0.30) 7 (0.43) 3 (0.18) 8 (0.49) 10.20 +0.20 (2.00%)
Katsuo Chikamatsu M 20 6 13 47.29% 1 (0.10) 2 (0.20) 2 (0.20) 3 (0.30) 6.19 +1.12 (22.31%)
Julian Mewa M 20 6 10 42.13%   1 (0.11) 4 (0.44) 4 (0.44) 6.60 +1.50 (30.00%)
David Leitão M 19 6 17 61.36% 1 (0.08) 2 (0.15) 5 (0.38) 6 (0.46) 6.53 +0.53 (8.82%)
Carl Lees M 20 6 14 41.83%     1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 6.14 +1.07 (21.43%)
Iain Myer M 20 6 13 53.46% 2 (0.17) 5 (0.44) 1 (0.09) 3 (0.26) 7.99 +1.99 (33.21%)
Frankie Dunn M 19 5 3 7.74%   1 (0.60) 1 (0.60) 1 (0.60) 5.20 +0.20 (4.00%)
Titus Vickerman S 33 8 21 88.32% 11 (0.58) 24 (1.26) 3 (0.16) 14 (0.74) 8.74 +0.74 (9.29%)
Hugo Cardona S 33 8 17 74.86% 8 (0.50) 17 (1.06)   8 (0.50) 8.16 +0.16 (2.06%)
Custódio Amorim S 18 4 13 34.09% 1 (0.14) 2 (0.27)   1 (0.14) 3.44 +0.36 (12.05%)
Geraldo Remédios S 17 3 13 37.99% 3 (0.37) 5 (0.61)   3 (0.37) 3.71 +0.71 (23.59%)
53.59% 37 78 28 65 7.53 + 1.15 (19.72%)
  1. Barming FC - Snygging United (1 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 3-4-3]
  2. Barming FC - Handsome Gang United (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Wolf Pack - Barming FC (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Barming FC - Glasgow Sambas (0 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  5. Tokushima Vortis - Barming FC (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Tranmere Rovers - Barming FC (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  7. Barming FC - Manchester City (1 - 0) [4-2-4 vs 5-4-1]
  8. Barming FC - Glasgow Sambas (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Bear Grylls Piss - Barming FC (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 5-2-3]
  10. Barming FC - Bear Grylls Piss (2 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 5-3-2]
  11. Diablo Bleu - Barming FC (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  12. Glasgow Sambas - Barming FC (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  13. Looney Pwns FC - Barming FC (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Manchester City - Barming FC (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  15. Rapid Manor - Barming FC (2 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  16. Barming FC - Tranmere Rovers (4 - 0) [5-2-3 vs 4-4-2]
  17. Barming FC - Green Bay Packers (4 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Barming FC - Tokushima Vortis (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  19. Barming FC - Team Wolfman (0 - 2) [5-2-3 vs 3-5-2]
  20. Barming FC - Wolf Pack (6 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  21. Snygging United - Barming FC (1 - 1) [4-2-4 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top