<

Overview :: Polished Chromium

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Chuck Liddell K 30 7 4 19.02%         9.38 +2.38 (33.93%)
Payton Hapgood K 19 5 13 67.93%         4.34 +0.26 (6.92%)
Gabriel Huntington K 19 5 3 10.87%         4.87 -0.13 (-2.67%)
Mel Pepper D 32 10 17 92.38% 1 (0.06) 4 (0.24)   1 (0.06) 10.67 +1.61 (17.84%)
Tihomir Bujosevic D 24 8 16 82.81% 1 (0.07) 3 (0.20) 4 (0.26) 5 (0.33) 7.53 +0.46 (6.72%)
Frankie Edgar D 20 8 18 93.86% 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12) 3 (0.17) 8.02 +1.91 (32.08%)
Josh Koscheck D 29 7 13 65.92%         8.70 +2.62 (43.53%)
Julian Kielty D 30 6 7 29.12%     1 (0.19) 1 (0.19) 8.33 +2.33 (38.81%)
Dean Felter M 31 9 17 86.24% 5 (0.32) 11 (0.69) 1 (0.06) 6 (0.38) 8.34 -0.66 (-7.39%)
Johnnie Bailey M 28 9 14 66.51% 3 (0.25) 5 (0.41) 6 (0.49) 9 (0.74) 9.38 +1.31 (16.34%)
Otelo Almirante M 23 7 16 74.66% 5 (0.36) 12 (0.87) 5 (0.36) 10 (0.73) 6.49 +0.43 (7.49%)
Richard Dunn M 20 7 16 82.81% 2 (0.13) 6 (0.39) 4 (0.26) 6 (0.39) 7.06 +1.00 (16.67%)
Peter Kauniainen M 29 7 8 42.17% 2 (0.26) 4 (0.52) 2 (0.26) 4 (0.52) 8.69 +1.69 (24.11%)
Gerson Laabi M 19 6 13 66.04%   8 (0.66) 3 (0.25) 3 (0.25) 6.72 +1.65 (32.92%)
Walter Schrøder S 30 9 11 55.58% 3 (0.29) 11 (1.08) 1 (0.10) 4 (0.39) 8.32 -0.68 (-7.58%)
Hank Savage S 25 8 16 69.88% 9 (0.70) 27 (2.10) 2 (0.16) 11 (0.86) 7.71 -0.29 (-3.59%)
Steven Whyte S 31 7 3 15.89%   2 (0.68)     8.63 +1.63 (23.33%)
Habib Remch S 18 6 12 54.28% 6 (0.60) 8 (0.80)   6 (0.60) 5.76 +0.68 (13.50%)
59.78% 38 102 31 69 7.72 + 1.01 (16.28%)
  1. Polished Chromium - Jambos Jokers (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Manchester Utd 19 Times - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Green Bay Packers - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Polished Chromium - Dezvirgineaza-ma (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Polished Chromium - BarcaLlandudno (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Polished Chromium - Barscenal Utd (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. Digital Fortress - Polished Chromium (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Polished Chromium - Russia Privjet (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  9. Denzil Athletic - Polished Chromium (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Polished Chromium - F.A (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  11. F.A - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Polished Chromium - C.S. Strollers (5 - 6) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Polished Chromium - Denzil Athletic (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Russia Privjet - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. Polished Chromium - Digital Fortress (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Barscenal Utd - Polished Chromium (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  17. Basils Bastards - Polished Chromium (2 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Polished Chromium - Manchester Utd 19 Times (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top