<

Overview :: Waterloo Warriors

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Jon Tottenham K 25 11 18 78.86%         12.72 +1.72 (15.66%)
Alessandro Colavecchio K 31 9 4 17.52%         12.00 +3.00 (33.33%)
Sunny Sandhu D 30 13 20 84.86%   2 (0.10) 1 (0.05) 1 (0.05) 16.35 +3.35 (25.77%)
Joel Depooter D 25 11 18 74.24% 2 (0.12) 8 (0.47) 1 (0.06) 3 (0.18) 14.33 +3.33 (30.30%)
Jason Swamy D 27 11 20 74.33%   1 (0.06) 2 (0.12) 2 (0.12) 12.85 +1.85 (16.82%)
Jeff Dineley D 25 10 17 61.57%   1 (0.07) 1 (0.07) 1 (0.07) 12.94 +2.94 (29.41%)
Edwin Woghiren D 22 9 13 42.76%     1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 10.23 +1.23 (13.68%)
Dave Rapini D 19 4 5 12.71%         4.20 +0.20 (5.00%)
Nick Giles M 32 12 19 70.29% 10 (0.62) 23 (1.43) 4 (0.25) 14 (0.87) 13.63 +1.63 (13.60%)
Alex Bittermann M 25 10 20 82.05% 3 (0.16) 7 (0.37) 7 (0.37) 10 (0.53) 12.30 +2.30 (23.00%)
Spico Reano M 25 10 16 59.62% 2 (0.15) 7 (0.51) 3 (0.22) 5 (0.37) 12.19 +2.19 (21.88%)
Angelo Nero M 26 9 19 69.14% 3 (0.19) 8 (0.51) 3 (0.19) 6 (0.38) 10.84 +1.84 (20.47%)
Trini Pierre M 24 9 20 76.43%   7 (0.40) 4 (0.23) 4 (0.23) 11.20 +2.20 (24.44%)
Paul Longo M 21 8 14 41.00%   4 (0.43) 1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 9.50 +1.50 (18.75%)
Steve Tully M 20 6 10 22.29%   1 (0.20) 1 (0.20) 1 (0.20) 6.60 +0.60 (10.00%)
Quingua Yang S 29 11 19 76.86% 12 (0.68) 26 (1.48) 5 (0.29) 17 (0.97) 12.37 +1.37 (12.44%)
Sean Opaski S 24 10 13 50.48% 9 (0.78) 17 (1.48) 3 (0.26) 12 (1.04) 11.77 +1.77 (17.69%)
Mister Gideon S 26 9 12 42.19% 5 (0.52) 10 (1.04)   5 (0.52) 10.83 +1.83 (20.37%)
Morgan Mahabir S 18 6 9 23.24% 2 (0.38) 5 (0.94)   2 (0.38) 6.44 +0.44 (7.41%)
55.81% 48 127 37 85 11.23 + 1.86 (18.95%)
  1. Waterloo Warriors - Bear Grylls Piss (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Waterloo Warriors - Balls Deep (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  3. Barming FC - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Tokushima Vortis - Waterloo Warriors (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Shoplifters OTW Utd - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Waterloo Warriors - Manchester City (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  7. Stoney Lads Club - Waterloo Warriors (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Shoplifters OTW Utd - Waterloo Warriors (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Waterloo Warriors - Battling Mariners (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Eskilsminne IF - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Waterloo Warriors - Eskilsminne IF (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Battling Mariners - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Waterloo Warriors - BarcaLlandudno (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  14. Waterloo Warriors - Shoplifters OTW Utd (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  15. Eskilsminne IF - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Manchester City - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  17. Waterloo Warriors - Looney Pwns FC (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  18. Waterloo Warriors - Tokushima Vortis (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  19. Waterloo Warriors - Bengal Barbarians (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  20. Balls Deep - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 4) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  21. Waterloo Warriors - Swindon Town (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  22. Bear Grylls Piss - Waterloo Warriors (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top