<

Overview :: Barming FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Matias Amado K 22 9 13 64.62%         10.46 +1.46 (16.24%)
Aitor Larrainzar K 20 5 7 32.92%         4.86 -0.14 (-2.86%)
Parker Tuttle D 31 10 19 97.54% 1 (0.05) 3 (0.16) 1 (0.05) 2 (0.11) 10.89 +0.89 (8.95%)
Otelo Macedo D 20 7 17 84.10% 1 (0.06) 12 (0.73) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12) 8.06 +1.06 (15.13%)
Horia Luca D 19 5 15 50.39% 1 (0.10) 1 (0.10)   1 (0.10) 5.00 -
Eugene Downing D 21 5 13 57.03%   1 (0.09)     5.08 +0.08 (1.54%)
Suharto Saputra D 18 4 10 27.46%   2 (0.37)     4.20 +0.20 (5.00%)
Snæbjórn Nansson D 19 4 11 37.78%         4.64 +0.64 (15.91%)
Arthur Stockdale M 32 10 19 94.03% 10 (0.55) 20 (1.09) 9 (0.49) 19 (1.04) 10.42 +0.42 (4.21%)
Katsuo Chikamatsu M 21 7 18 76.40% 2 (0.13) 4 (0.27) 4 (0.27) 6 (0.40) 9.50 +2.50 (35.71%)
Aaron Xicluna M 21 6 15 72.82% 4 (0.28) 7 (0.49) 2 (0.14) 6 (0.42) 8.33 +2.33 (38.89%)
Rob Craven M 19 5 16 71.82%     2 (0.14) 2 (0.14) 6.88 +1.88 (37.50%)
Eduardo Gago M 19 5 15 62.28% 4 (0.33) 7 (0.58) 2 (0.16) 6 (0.49) 5.67 +0.67 (13.33%)
Bãnel Berta M 18 4 13 38.62%   4 (0.53) 4 (0.53) 4 (0.53) 5.62 +1.62 (40.38%)
Titus Vickerman S 34 8 19 97.43% 10 (0.53) 19 (1.00) 6 (0.32) 16 (0.84) 10.00 +2.00 (25.00%)
Yegor Bavin S 20 5 14 52.51% 4 (0.39) 9 (0.88) 2 (0.20) 6 (0.59) 6.36 +1.36 (27.14%)
Eusébio Camões S 18 4 9 30.80% 3 (0.50) 7 (1.17) 2 (0.33) 5 (0.83) 4.78 +0.78 (19.44%)
Julio Danílson S 16 3 9 24.83% 1 (0.21) 5 (1.03) 1 (0.21) 2 (0.41) 3.44 +0.44 (14.81%)
59.63% 41 101 36 77 6.90 + 1.07 (18.61%)
  1. Snygging United - Barming FC (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. AC.Milan - Barming FC (0 - 6) [4-3-3 vs 3-4-3]
  3. Barming FC - Cleveland Steamers (2 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Balls Deep - Barming FC (1 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  5. Barming FC - Balls Deep (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Barming FC - Rapid Manor (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  7. Shoplifters OTW Utd - Barming FC (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  8. Stoney Lads Club - Barming FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  9. Barming FC - Digital Fortress (1 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Unbelievable Tekkers FC - Barming FC (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  11. Barming FC - The Companion Cavalry (1 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  12. The Companion Cavalry - Barming FC (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Barming FC - Unbelievable Tekkers FC (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-4-3]
  14. Barming FC - The Companion Cavalry (0 - 2) [5-4-1 vs 4-5-1]
  15. Digital Fortress - Barming FC (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Barming FC - Shoplifters OTW Utd (0 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  17. Balls Deep - Barming FC (1 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Cleveland Steamers - Barming FC (3 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  19. Barming FC - Snygging United (3 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top