<

Overview :: Polished Chromium

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Bonifácio Natalino K 31 10 11 64.13%         11.45 +1.45 (14.55%)
Payton Hapgood K 20 6 6 34.98%         6.67 +0.67 (11.11%)
Stewart Acombe D 32 10 15 87.45% 5 (0.33) 18 (1.20) 3 (0.20) 8 (0.53) 11.53 +1.53 (15.33%)
Mel Pepper D 33 10 11 63.50% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.18) 10.82 +0.82 (8.18%)
Tihomir Bujosevic D 25 9 13 73.76% 1 (0.08) 2 (0.16) 1 (0.08) 2 (0.16) 10.69 +1.69 (18.80%)
Frankie Edgar D 21 9 15 78.45% 1 (0.07) 2 (0.15) 1 (0.07) 2 (0.15) 11.20 +2.20 (24.44%)
Lineu Passos D 18 6 12 58.30%         6.75 +0.75 (12.50%)
Dean Felter M 32 9 15 84.03% 2 (0.14) 6 (0.42) 5 (0.35) 7 (0.49) 9.33 +0.33 (3.70%)
Johnnie Bailey M 29 9 16 86.76% 5 (0.34) 11 (0.74) 4 (0.27) 9 (0.60) 10.38 +1.38 (15.28%)
Gerson Laabi M 20 8 14 81.62% 2 (0.14) 4 (0.29) 2 (0.14) 4 (0.29) 9.79 +1.79 (22.32%)
Richard Dunn M 21 8 16 87.58% 2 (0.13) 2 (0.13) 1 (0.07) 3 (0.20) 9.38 +1.38 (17.19%)
Otelo Almirante M 24 7 5 22.31%     1 (0.26) 1 (0.26) 7.00 -
Marin Stanca M 18 5 11 36.57%   1 (0.16) 1 (0.16) 1 (0.16) 5.91 +0.91 (18.18%)
Kalle Mustalahti M 17 4 11 38.40%   1 (0.15)     4.64 +0.64 (15.91%)
Hank Savage S 26 9 15 87.01% 6 (0.40) 20 (1.34) 4 (0.27) 10 (0.67) 10.00 +1.00 (11.11%)
Habib Remch S 19 7 9 50.44% 6 (0.69) 10 (1.16) 1 (0.12) 7 (0.81) 8.89 +1.89 (26.98%)
Milovan Dragovic S 19 5 3 6.91%         4.67 -0.33 (-6.67%)
Herve Henrion S 18 5   8 27.44%   3 (0.64) 1 (0.21) 1 (0.21) 4.88 -0.12 (-2.50%)
Ljubinko Trifkovic S 16 4 6 20.60% 1 (0.28) 2 (0.57)   1 (0.28) 5.00 +1.00 (25.00%)
57.38% 32 83 26 58 8.37 + 1.05 (13.97%)
  1. Polished Chromium - Newcastle United (7 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Polished Chromium - Team Wolfman (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Olympic Sprinters - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Polished Chromium - Barcaloonies (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Polished Chromium - Bear Grylls Piss (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Tokushima Vortis - Polished Chromium (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Eskilsminne IF - Polished Chromium (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Polished Chromium - Manchester City (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  9. Manchester City - Polished Chromium (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Polished Chromium - Eskilsminne IF (2 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Balls Deep - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Polished Chromium - Tokushima Vortis (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Stoney Lads Club - Polished Chromium (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  14. Bear Grylls Piss - Polished Chromium (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. Barcaloonies - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Polished Chromium - Olympic Sprinters (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Newcastle United - Polished Chromium (0 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top