<

Overview :: Washington Senators

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Quan Yin K 31 11 13 45.96%         11.69 +0.69 (6.29%)
Neil Haslop K 26 8 13 53.21%         9.85 +1.85 (23.08%)
Charles Huddison D 32 9 20 88.73% 2 (0.10) 4 (0.20) 5 (0.25) 7 (0.36) 11.10 +3.05 (37.92%)
Yrjö Väkiparta D 27 9 21 90.79% 1 (0.05) 4 (0.20) 1 (0.05) 2 (0.10) 11.43 +3.38 (42.06%)
Mortimer Rowlands D 34 8 19 82.36%   1 (0.05) 3 (0.16) 3 (0.16) 10.00 +2.00 (25.00%)
Angel Verona D 21 6 1 1.42%         7.00 +1.00 (16.67%)
Declan Keith D 18 5 12 44.10%     1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 4.58 +0.50 (12.50%)
Alfredo Raymonda D 17 4 15 55.07%     1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 5.87 +1.87 (46.67%)
Juan Pineda M 32 10 22 95.05% 8 (0.38) 31 (1.47) 13 (0.62) 21 (1.00) 11.73 +1.73 (17.27%)
Wen Jiang M 26 10 22 99.17% 5 (0.23) 12 (0.55) 10 (0.45) 15 (0.68) 10.95 +1.91 (21.06%)
Alexis Claveau M 34 8 22 98.04% 14 (0.64) 39 (1.79) 5 (0.23) 19 (0.87) 11.09 +3.09 (38.64%)
Massimiliano Bashiri M 29 8 18 65.21% 3 (0.21) 8 (0.55) 3 (0.21) 6 (0.41) 10.00 +2.00 (25.00%)
Pang Guo Mui M 22 6 2 6.22%         8.00 +2.00 (33.33%)
Daniel Escalada M 17 5 20 77.76% 2 (0.12) 7 (0.41) 4 (0.23) 6 (0.35) 6.05 +1.05 (21.00%)
Stewart McNeil S 30 8 16 68.79% 9 (0.59) 29 (1.90) 3 (0.20) 12 (0.79) 9.06 +1.06 (13.28%)
Valéry Binya S 33 8 15 51.79% 5 (0.44) 22 (1.91) 1 (0.09) 6 (0.52) 10.00 +2.00 (25.00%)
Walter Wiggers S 17 4 18 67.17% 9 (0.60) 16 (1.07) 4 (0.27) 13 (0.87) 4.94 +0.94 (23.61%)
64.17% 58 173 54 112 9.02 + 1.77 (25.20%)
  1. SexPanther FC - Washington Senators (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Washington Senators - Dan Town (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. BOB Deep Bangers - Washington Senators (5 - 6) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Washington Senators - FC Pigeon Brains (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Connacht Hotspurs - Washington Senators (1 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Washington Senators - AS Ballymac (2 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. Washington Senators - Hamsterdam FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Crack City Rovers - Washington Senators (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Washington Senators - Pikey Hunters (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  10. Vice City Rovers - Washington Senators (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  11. Washington Senators - Red Star (5 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Red Star - Washington Senators (2 - 6) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. Washington Senators - Vice City Rovers (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Pikey Hunters - Washington Senators (0 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. Washington Senators - Crack City Rovers (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Hamsterdam FC - Washington Senators (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. AS Ballymac - Washington Senators (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Washington Senators - Connacht Hotspurs (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  19. FC Pigeon Brains - Washington Senators (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  20. Washington Senators - BOB Deep Bangers (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  21. Dan Town - Washington Senators (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  22. Washington Senators - SexPanther FC (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top