<

Overview :: Lounge Football Utd

 >
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Julius Bächle K 25 11 65 44.46%         8.35 +0.41 (6.12%)
Bradley Gould K 24 9 55 37.29%         8.40 +0.72 (9.00%)
Jin Nan K 20 6 14 9.76%         4.64 -
Romeo Keating K 29 6 11 7.74%         6.12 +0.12 (1.97%)
Thommy Bull D 30 15 138 94.47% 5 (0.04) 12 (0.09) 16 (0.12) 21 (0.16) 14.39 +1.62 (12.70%)
Rio Southgate D 29 13 126 85.98% 4 (0.03) 9 (0.07) 16 (0.13) 20 (0.16) 12.28 +1.56 (14.82%)
Gavin Hicks D 25 11 108 65.41%   1 (0.01) 4 (0.04) 4 (0.04) 7.94 +1.08 (16.67%)
Artie Ruddock D 32 10 79 53.23% 2 (0.03) 8 (0.11) 6 (0.08) 8 (0.11) 10.87 +1.23 (12.62%)
Bernard Franklin D 22 9 50 25.26%   2 (0.06) 1 (0.03) 1 (0.03) 7.04 +0.78 (13.75%)
Harold Cadbury D 34 8 40 24.22% 4 (0.12) 13 (0.38) 2 (0.06) 6 (0.17) 9.70 +1.10 (13.31%)
Godfrey Gornall D 20 6 18 9.95%         4.52 -0.09 (-2.36%)
Francis Prats D 19 5 21 10.56% 1 (0.07) 1 (0.07) 1 (0.07) 2 (0.13) 3.86 +0.10 (2.14%)
Andrew Brough D 17 4 8 2.75%         3.12 -
Domenico Cortez D 17 4   7 2.91%         3.71 -0.29 (-7.14%)
Wes Hoolahan D 21 4 3 1.81%         4.40 +0.40 (10.00%)
Osheen Ormondroyd D 17 3 11 6.63%         2.40 +0.04 (3.94%)
Preston Hateley M 26 13 102 66.89% 29 (0.31) 105 (1.11) 22 (0.23) 51 (0.54) 10.68 +1.32 (14.82%)
Leroy Cornfeld M 33 12 124 80.14% 15 (0.13) 58 (0.51) 28 (0.25) 43 (0.38) 11.58 +1.28 (12.45%)
Filbert Dye M 32 12 125 83.81% 29 (0.24) 66 (0.55) 25 (0.21) 54 (0.45) 11.60 +1.06 (9.80%)
Brian Staunton M 24 10 81 45.78% 9 (0.14) 39 (0.60) 9 (0.14) 18 (0.28) 7.87 +1.55 (23.61%)
Karol Pog M 25 10 68 42.26% 16 (0.27) 31 (0.52) 14 (0.23) 30 (0.50) 9.83 +2.04 (26.08%)
Zach Barter M 21 8 43 19.13% 3 (0.11) 8 (0.29) 4 (0.15) 7 (0.26) 6.40 +0.63 (10.58%)
Alfie Dewhurst M 34 8 25 17.06% 4 (0.17) 10 (0.41) 5 (0.21) 9 (0.37) 7.40 -0.60 (-7.50%)
Peppino Preite M 37 8 6 3.63%   2 (0.39)     7.15 -1.18 (-14.49%)
Kirk Pidgeley M 33 8 19 13.38% 3 (0.16) 8 (0.42) 4 (0.21) 7 (0.37) 8.90 +0.90 (11.25%)
Errol Bromby M 20 7 43 27.07% 4 (0.10) 15 (0.39) 2 (0.05) 6 (0.16) 5.75 +0.47 (10.30%)
Valdemar Nyrén M 18 5 17 5.68%   1 (0.12)     4.24 +0.41 (10.98%)
Carolinus Martin M 19 5 8 3.78% 1 (0.19) 4 (0.74) 2 (0.37) 3 (0.56) 6.50 +1.50 (30.00%)
Grant Holt M 19 5 14 9.24%   1 (0.08) 2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 6.44 +1.44 (28.86%)
Nate Baxendale M 18 3 7 4.93%         2.94 +0.51 (22.62%)
Errol Bullard S 25 11 89 46.64% 30 (0.45) 63 (0.95) 10 (0.15) 40 (0.60) 8.57 +1.04 (14.90%)
Dermot Grieves S 35 9 103 66.44% 37 (0.39) 91 (0.96) 16 (0.17) 53 (0.56) 10.27 +0.81 (8.63%)
Dirk Bradley S 23 8 55 31.32% 14 (0.31) 26 (0.58) 2 (0.04) 16 (0.36) 7.34 +1.00 (14.68%)
Abraham Ashcroft S 31 8 8 5.26%   5 (0.67)     8.22 +0.23 (2.81%)
Danang Sinaga S 24 7 18 11.98% 11 (0.65) 20 (1.17) 2 (0.12) 13 (0.76) 7.22 +0.22 (3.17%)
Monty Beck S 20 6 21 9.60% 4 (0.29) 12 (0.88) 2 (0.15) 6 (0.44) 5.57 +0.81 (17.06%)
Marshall Post S 19 4 1 0.40%         4.00 -
Maximiano Uchoa S 18 4 12 7.66%   4 (0.37) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 3.83 -0.17 (-4.37%)
28.54% 225 615 196 421 7.21 + 0.69 (10.11%)
  1. Lounge Football Utd - McMoisty XI (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Lounge Football Utd - Kashyyyk Knights (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  3. The Federation - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  4. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  5. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Lounge Football Utd - Lost Souls Alliance (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  7. The Unholy Alliance - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  8. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Fancy Dans (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  9. Bloggie FC - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 5-4-1]
  10. Go Ahead Pigeons - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  11. Lounge Football Utd - Go Ahead Pigeons (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  12. Lounge Football Utd - Bloggie FC (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Montreal Fancy Dans - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  14. Lounge Football Utd - The Unholy Alliance (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-2-3]
  15. Lost Souls Alliance - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  16. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  17. Lounge Football Utd - Champions Bespoke (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (3 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  19. Kashyyyk Knights - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  20. McMoisty XI - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  21. Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  22. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (5 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  23. Lounge Football Utd - Kickers XI (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  24. Lounge Football Utd - The New Saint (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  25. Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  26. Lounge Football Utd - Go Ahead Pigeons (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  27. Lounge Football Utd - McMoisty XI (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  28. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  29. Metal Militia - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  30. Lounge Football Utd - Metal Militia (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  31. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (0 - 3) [5-2-3 vs 4-5-1]
  32. McMoisty XI - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  33. Go Ahead Pigeons - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  34. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  35. The New Saint - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  36. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  37. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  38. Lounge Football Utd - Victoria Gardens (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  39. Lounge Football Utd - Real Football Team 66 (1 - 6) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  40. Lounge Football Utd - Suzykins Utd (0 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  41. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  42. Lounge Football Utd - Lost Souls Alliance (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  43. Bloggie FC - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 5-4-1]
  44. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  45. Lounge Football Utd - Suzykins Utd (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  46. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (0 - 2) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  47. Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  48. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  49. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 5-3-2]
  50. Suzykins Utd - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  51. Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  52. Lounge Football Utd - Bloggie FC (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  53. Lost Souls Alliance - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  54. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  55. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  56. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  57. Lounge Football Utd - cfc1905 (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  58. Lounge Football Utd - FC caledonia (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  59. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  60. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (0 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  61. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (0 - 3) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  62. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-2-3]
  63. Lounge Football Utd - Nam Town (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  64. The Federation - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  65. Lounge Football Utd - Real Football Team 66 (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  66. Real Football Team 66 - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  67. Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (1 - 0) [5-2-3 vs 4-5-1]
  68. Nam Town - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  69. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  70. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  71. Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 3-4-3]
  72. Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  73. Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (0 - 2) [5-2-3 vs 5-4-1]
  74. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  75. Lounge Football Utd - Singers FC (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  76. The Federation - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-2-3]
  77. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  78. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  79. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-2-3]
  80. Lounge Football Utd - Kickers XI (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  81. Arsenal Utd - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  82. Lounge Football Utd - Dial Square Dukes (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  83. Dial Square Dukes - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  84. Lounge Football Utd - Arsenal Utd (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  85. Kickers XI - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  86. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  87. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-2-3]
  88. Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  89. Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  90. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  91. Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  92. The Federation - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-2-3]
  93. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  94. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  95. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-4-1]
  96. Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  97. Nam Town - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  98. Lounge Football Utd - Llama United (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  99. Llama United - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  100. Lounge Football Utd - Nam Town (2 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  101. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  102. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  103. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  104. Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  105. Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (4 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  106. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  107. Lounge Football Utd - Nam Town (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  108. Lounge Football Utd - Llama United (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  109. Kashyyyk Knights - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  110. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-2-3]
  111. The Federation - Lounge Football Utd (5 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-2-3]
  112. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  113. Lounge Football Utd - Arsenal Utd (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  114. Unholy Alliance - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  115. Lounge Football Utd - Unholy Alliance (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  116. Arsenal Utd - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  117. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  118. Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  119. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (1 - 4) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  120. Lounge Football Utd - Kashyyyk Knights (5 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  121. Llama United - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  122. Lounge Football Utd - Kickers XI (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  123. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  124. Lounge Football Utd - Unholy Alliance (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  125. Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  126. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  127. The Federation - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  128. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  129. Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  130. Nam Town - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  131. Lounge Football Utd - Nam Town (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  132. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  133. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  134. Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  135. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  136. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  137. Unholy Alliance - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  138. Lounge Football Utd - Nam Town (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  139. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (7 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  140. Arsenal Utd - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  141. Lounge Football Utd - Llama United (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top

About :: FAQ :: Changelog :: Last updated: Wed Oct 24 00:57:54 2012.