<

Overview :: Twin Peaks Rangers

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Robbie Elms K 30 15 8 56.40%         17.25 +2.25 (15.00%)
Adérito Curado K 21 8 6 42.30%         8.50 +0.50 (6.25%)
Rhys Owen D 30 13 14 98.70%     3 (0.21) 3 (0.21) 15.36 +2.36 (18.13%)
Concetto Russo D 30 13 12 81.07%     2 (0.17) 2 (0.17) 16.42 +3.42 (26.28%)
Sam Stanley D 23 12 12 70.27%     1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 12.92 +0.92 (7.64%)
Gerhard Adolphson D 21 8 11 46.97%     1 (0.15) 1 (0.15) 9.64 +1.64 (20.45%)
Caj Lövskog D 21 7 8 23.60%         8.38 +1.38 (19.64%)
Juliano Pantanelli D 17 4 7 43.91%     1 (0.16) 1 (0.16) 5.29 +1.29 (32.14%)
Marco Morano M 32 13 13 91.65% 14 (1.08) 23 (1.77) 3 (0.23) 17 (1.31) 15.00 +2.00 (15.38%)
Pippino Antonellini M 31 13 11 77.55% 3 (0.27) 3 (0.27)   3 (0.27) 14.91 +1.91 (14.69%)
Gary Archie M 28 13 11 77.55% 2 (0.18) 3 (0.27) 2 (0.18) 4 (0.36) 13.45 +0.45 (3.50%)
Arnold Dye M 24 10 13 84.60% 3 (0.25) 5 (0.42) 1 (0.08) 4 (0.33) 12.15 +2.15 (21.54%)
Anton Mjällby M 21 8 9 49.20%     2 (0.29) 2 (0.29) 9.56 +1.56 (19.44%)
Mikael Tengstedt M 19 6 9 33.03%     1 (0.21) 1 (0.21) 5.78 -0.22 (-3.70%)
Paul Antonsson M 17 4 10 30.57%   1 (0.23) 1 (0.23) 1 (0.23) 4.60 +0.60 (15.00%)
Charlie Richardson S 28 12 2 14.10% 1 (0.50) 2 (1.00)   1 (0.50) 14.50 +2.50 (20.83%)
Rees Oakes S 24 11 11 64.90% 2 (0.22) 6 (0.65) 2 (0.22) 4 (0.43) 13.64 +2.64 (23.97%)
Aco Zobenica S 23 10 11 63.68% 4 (0.44) 10 (1.11) 2 (0.22) 6 (0.66) 11.09 +1.09 (10.91%)
Arkady Beloglazov S 17 4 10 35.63%     1 (0.20) 1 (0.20) 4.70 +0.70 (17.50%)
57.14% 29 53 23 52 11.22 + 1.53 (16.03%)
  1. Twin Peaks Rangers - Llama United (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  2. Twin Peaks Rangers - AC Dingers (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  3. Nam Town - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-4-1]
  5. The Federation - Twin Peaks Rangers (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Twin Peaks Rangers - Montreal Yo-yos (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Bespoke - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 2) [5-2-3 vs 5-4-1]
  8. Twin Peaks Rangers - Bespoke (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Montreal Yo-yos - Twin Peaks Rangers (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Twin Peaks Rangers - The Federation (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  11. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Twin Peaks Rangers - Nam Town (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  13. AC Dingers - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Llama United - Twin Peaks Rangers (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top