<

Overview :: Bespoke

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Theo Francis Chris K 31 12 9 63.59%         12.22 +0.22 (1.85%)
Andy Waring K 21 7 5 35.33%         6.80 -0.20 (-2.86%)
Gordon Jones D 31 12 14 95.93%   2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 13.50 +1.50 (12.50%)
Richard Tidmarsh D 28 12 13 86.33%   1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 14.23 +2.23 (18.59%)
Jason Guy D 35 10 7 36.25%         11.29 +1.29 (12.86%)
Hello Dave D 24 10 13 69.20% 1 (0.10) 3 (0.31)   1 (0.10) 12.46 +2.46 (24.62%)
Liam Baker D 19 6 10 48.77%   1 (0.14)     6.00 -
Jason Murfitt D 18 5 8 24.19%         5.62 +0.62 (12.50%)
Phil Thomas D 16 2 6 24.12%         3.17 +1.17 (58.33%)
Steve Johnston M 30 15 14 83.56% 3 (0.25) 10 (0.85) 3 (0.25) 6 (0.51) 15.79 +0.79 (5.24%)
Jonny Challis M 28 13 12 83.64% 2 (0.17) 3 (0.25) 6 (0.51) 8 (0.68) 15.58 +2.58 (19.87%)
Simon Browning M 29 12 13 80.41% 4 (0.35) 6 (0.53) 4 (0.35) 8 (0.70) 14.62 +2.62 (21.79%)
Pendleton Mardi Gras M 23 10 11 72.81%         10.36 +0.36 (3.64%)
Daniel Thursfield M 20 9 11 59.29% 1 (0.12) 3 (0.36) 1 (0.12) 2 (0.24) 10.73 +1.73 (19.19%)
John Morrison M 20 8 11 48.92%   2 (0.29) 1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 8.27 +0.27 (3.41%)
David Tonkin M 17 4 7 25.27% 1 (0.28) 1 (0.28)   1 (0.28) 3.71 -0.29 (-7.14%)
Dom Glennon S 31 12 13 62.98% 5 (0.56) 13 (1.46) 2 (0.22) 7 (0.79) 12.85 +0.85 (7.05%)
Hakan Caglak S 22 10 12 68.59% 7 (0.72) 20 (2.06) 1 (0.10) 8 (0.82) 10.50 +0.50 (5.00%)
Russell Cane S 18 6 5 18.97%   3 (1.12)     5.80 -0.20 (-3.33%)
57.27% 24 68 21 45 10.18 + 1.03 (11.84%)
  1. AC Dingers - Bespoke (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Bespoke - Nam Town (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  3. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  4. Bespoke - The Federation (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Montreal Yo-yos - Bespoke (3 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Llama United - Bespoke (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  7. Bespoke - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 2) [5-2-3 vs 5-4-1]
  8. Twin Peaks Rangers - Bespoke (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Bespoke - Llama United (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  10. Bespoke - Montreal Yo-yos (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. The Federation - Bespoke (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  13. Nam Town - Bespoke (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Bespoke - AC Dingers (2 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top