| < | Overview :: Lounge Football Utd |
> |
| Name | Position | Age | Skill | Special | # | Pitch time | Goals | Chances | Assists | A. Chances | Avg. grade | Performance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julius Bächle | K | 22 | 8 | |
11 | 77.91% | 8.55 | +0.55 (6.82%) | |||||
| Jin Nan | K | 17 | 4 | |
3 | 21.25% | 3.00 | -1.00 (-25.00%) | |||||
| Thommy Bull | D | 27 | 14 | |
14 | 92.61% | 1 (0.08) | 1 (0.08) | 15.79 | +1.79 (12.76%) | |||
| Rio Southgate | D | 26 | 12 | |
13 | 90.45% | 1 (0.08) | 1 (0.08) | 14.62 | +2.62 (21.79%) | |||
| Artie Ruddock | D | 32 | 10 | |
7 | 49.58% | 1 (0.14) | 1 (0.14) | 12.57 | +2.57 (25.71%) | |||
| Gavin Hicks | D | 22 | 8 | |
12 | 68.05% | 1 (0.10) | 9.58 | +1.58 (19.79%) | ||||
| Bernard Franklin | D | 19 | 6 | |
8 | 35.57% | 6.12 | +0.12 (2.08%) | |||||
| Francis Prats | D | 16 | 3 | |
6 | 32.02% | 3.00 | - | |||||
| Leroy Cornfeld | M | 30 | 11 | |
14 | 95.61% | 1 (0.07) | 7 (0.52) | 3 (0.22) | 4 (0.30) | 12.79 | +1.79 (16.23%) | |
| Filbert Dye | M | 29 | 11 | |
14 | 94.00% | 3 (0.23) | 6 (0.45) | 3 (0.23) | 6 (0.45) | 13.21 | +2.21 (20.13%) | |
| Preston Hateley | M | 23 | 10 | |
13 | 84.53% | 5 (0.42) | 13 (1.09) | 4 (0.34) | 9 (0.75) | 12.15 | +2.15 (21.54%) | |
| Karol Pog | M | 22 | 8 | |
12 | 71.82% | 2 (0.20) | 4 (0.39) | 2 (0.20) | 4 (0.39) | 10.25 | +2.25 (28.12%) | |
| Brian Staunton | M | 21 | 7 | |
11 | 61.35% | 1 (0.12) | 5 (0.58) | 1 (0.12) | 2 (0.23) | 9.27 | +2.27 (32.47%) | |
| Zach Barter | M | 18 | 5 | |
9 | 31.79% | 1 (0.22) | 2 (0.45) | 1 (0.22) | 2 (0.45) | 5.78 | +0.78 (15.56%) | |
| Dermot Grieves | S | 33 | 10 | |
12 | 79.29% | 2 (0.18) | 10 (0.89) | 1 (0.09) | 3 (0.27) | 11.17 | +1.17 (11.67%) | |
| Errol Bullard | S | 22 | 8 | |
13 | 57.43% | 4 (0.49) | 10 (1.23) | 2 (0.25) | 6 (0.74) | 9.46 | +1.46 (18.27%) | |
| Dirk Bradley | S | 23 | 8 | |
11 | 47.42% | 4 (0.60) | 6 (0.90) | 4 (0.60) | 9.73 | +1.73 (21.59%) | ||
| 64.16% | 23 | 64 | 20 | 43 | 9.83 | + 1.50 (15.60%) |
The Federation - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-2-3]
Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-4-1]
Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
Nam Town - Lounge Football Utd (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Lounge Football Utd - Llama United (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
Llama United - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
Lounge Football Utd - Nam Town (2 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (4 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]