| < | Overview :: AC Dingers |
> |
| Name | Position | Age | Skill | Special | # | Pitch time | Goals | Chances | Assists | A. Chances | Avg. grade | Performance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micah Gill | K | 29 | 11 | |
7 | 49.58% | 11.29 | +0.29 (2.60%) | |||||
| Niall Keen | K | 24 | 9 | |
7 | 49.58% | 10.29 | +1.29 (14.29%) | |||||
| Mathew Toms | D | 31 | 11 | |
12 | 83.14% | 1 (0.09) | 2 (0.17) | 1 (0.09) | 2 (0.17) | 11.25 | +0.25 (2.27%) | |
| Lewis Stamford | D | 23 | 10 | |
13 | 92.07% | 1 (0.08) | 1 (0.08) | 1 (0.08) | 11.92 | +1.92 (19.23%) | ||
| Kearney Hoult | D | 22 | 9 | |
11 | 72.67% | 11.09 | +2.09 (23.23%) | |||||
| Patric Wallén | D | 25 | 9 | |
11 | 77.91% | 10.55 | +1.55 (17.17%) | |||||
| Luther Beake | D | 17 | 4 | |
6 | 42.49% | 5.33 | +1.33 (33.33%) | |||||
| Wes Parton | M | 25 | 10 | |
13 | 92.07% | 8 (0.62) | 1 (0.08) | 1 (0.08) | 10.23 | +0.23 (2.31%) | ||
| Matt Broomhall | M | 25 | 10 | |
12 | 84.99% | 1 (0.08) | 6 (0.50) | 1 (0.08) | 2 (0.17) | 9.50 | -0.50 (-5.00%) | |
| Iosif Hrubaru | M | 22 | 10 | |
12 | 84.99% | 1 (0.08) | 3 (0.25) | 4 (0.33) | 5 (0.42) | 10.50 | +0.50 (5.00%) | |
| Hank Pellock | M | 31 | 10 | |
8 | 56.66% | 2 (0.25) | 10.75 | +0.75 (7.50%) | ||||
| Shawn Jeffers | M | 21 | 7 | |
10 | 70.82% | 3 (0.30) | 8.20 | +1.20 (17.14%) | ||||
| Phil Tate | M | 19 | 5 | |
6 | 42.49% | 1 (0.17) | 2 (0.33) | 1 (0.17) | 6.17 | +1.17 (23.33%) | ||
| Fredrick Sheridan | M | 18 | 4 | |
5 | 35.41% | 1 (0.20) | 5.40 | +1.40 (35.00%) | ||||
| Les Ellefson | S | 23 | 10 | |
12 | 84.99% | 5 (0.42) | 11 (0.92) | 1 (0.08) | 6 (0.50) | 10.08 | +0.08 (0.83%) | |
| Jez Edworthy | S | 33 | 7 | |
2 | 8.78% | 1 (0.81) | 2 (1.61) | 1 (0.81) | 7.00 | - | ||
| Vitaly Vanyushin | S | 19 | 6 | |
9 | 62.05% | 3 (0.34) | 6.44 | +0.44 (7.41%) | ||||
| 64.16% | 10 | 44 | 9 | 19 | 9.18 | + 0.87 (12.85%) |
AC Dingers - Bespoke (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
Twin Peaks Rangers - AC Dingers (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
AC Dingers - Llama United (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
AC Dingers - Nam Town (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
The Federation - AC Dingers (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
AC Dingers - Montreal Yo-yos (1 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
Montreal Yo-yos - AC Dingers (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
AC Dingers - The Federation (0 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
Nam Town - AC Dingers (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
Llama United - AC Dingers (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
AC Dingers - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
Bespoke - AC Dingers (2 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]