<

Overview :: Twin Peaks Rangers

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Robbie Elms K 32 15 7 49.58%         17.43 +2.43 (16.19%)
Adérito Curado K 23 9 7 49.58%         8.29 -0.71 (-7.94%)
Concetto Russo D 32 14 11 76.29% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.19) 17.64 +3.64 (25.97%)
Sam Stanley D 25 13 10 70.82% 1 (0.10) 1 (0.10)   1 (0.10) 14.30 +1.30 (10.00%)
Rhys Owen D 32 13 11 77.91%         14.27 +1.27 (9.79%)
Gerhard Adolphson D 23 10 11 63.66%         12.45 +2.45 (24.55%)
Caj Lövskog D 23 9 10 53.19%         11.20 +2.20 (24.44%)
Juliano Pantanelli D 19 7 3 12.24%     1 (0.58) 1 (0.58) 7.33 +0.33 (4.76%)
Gary Archie M 30 14 12 72.06% 1 (0.10) 3 (0.29) 1 (0.10) 2 (0.20) 14.17 +0.17 (1.19%)
Marco Morano M 34 13 12 82.06% 4 (0.35) 16 (1.38) 4 (0.35) 8 (0.69) 15.00 +2.00 (15.38%)
Pippino Antonellini M 33 13 11 77.91% 2 (0.18) 6 (0.55) 3 (0.27) 5 (0.45) 14.00 +1.00 (7.69%)
Arnold Dye M 26 12 10 66.36%   3 (0.32) 3 (0.32) 3 (0.32) 13.20 +1.20 (10.00%)
Anton Mjällby M 23 10 9 52.04% 2 (0.27) 3 (0.41)   2 (0.27) 12.00 +2.00 (20.00%)
Mikael Tengstedt M 21 8 8 45.96% 2 (0.31) 4 (0.62) 3 (0.46) 5 (0.77) 8.88 +0.88 (10.94%)
Paul Antonsson M 19 6 8 45.88%     1 (0.15) 1 (0.15) 8.00 +2.00 (33.33%)
Sidney Jonsteg M 17 3 7 25.17%         3.86 +0.86 (28.57%)
Rees Oakes S 26 13 10 57.66% 6 (0.74) 11 (1.35)   6 (0.74) 14.80 +1.80 (13.85%)
Aco Zobenica S 25 12 11 68.44% 4 (0.41) 7 (0.72) 2 (0.21) 6 (0.62) 12.18 +0.18 (1.52%)
Arkady Beloglazov S 19 6 8 43.88% 1 (0.16) 2 (0.32) 1 (0.16) 2 (0.32) 7.50 +1.50 (25.00%)
57.40% 24 57 20 44 11.92 + 1.39 (14.49%)
  1. Twin Peaks Rangers - Nam Town (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Unholy Alliance - Twin Peaks Rangers (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  4. Twin Peaks Rangers - Montreal Yo-yos (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  5. Twin Peaks Rangers - The Federation (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Bespoke - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  7. AC Dingers - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Twin Peaks Rangers - AC Dingers (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  9. Twin Peaks Rangers - Bespoke (1 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  10. The Federation - Twin Peaks Rangers (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  11. Montreal Yo-yos - Twin Peaks Rangers (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. Twin Peaks Rangers - Unholy Alliance (4 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Nam Town - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top