<

Overview :: Lounge Football Utd

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Julius Bächle K 24 10 11 71.47%         10.27 +0.27 (2.73%)
Jin Nan K 19 5 4 27.30%         5.75 +0.75 (15.00%)
Thommy Bull D 29 15 14 94.63%   1 (0.07)     16.43 +1.43 (9.52%)
Rio Southgate D 28 13 14 98.77% 1 (0.07) 2 (0.14) 4 (0.29) 5 (0.36) 14.64 +1.64 (12.64%)
Gavin Hicks D 24 10 13 79.52%         11.15 +1.15 (11.54%)
Bernard Franklin D 21 8 12 63.57%     1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 8.92 +0.92 (11.46%)
Francis Prats D 18 4 6 31.21% 1 (0.23) 1 (0.23)   1 (0.23) 4.83 +0.83 (20.83%)
Andrew Brough D 16 3 7 27.15%         3.00 -
Filbert Dye M 31 12 14 97.93% 5 (0.36) 9 (0.65) 2 (0.14) 7 (0.50) 13.21 +1.21 (10.12%)
Preston Hateley M 25 12 13 77.07% 3 (0.27) 17 (1.56) 3 (0.27) 6 (0.55) 13.92 +1.92 (16.03%)
Leroy Cornfeld M 32 12 13 87.50%   4 (0.32) 3 (0.24) 3 (0.24) 13.15 +1.15 (9.62%)
Karol Pog M 24 9 11 67.79% 2 (0.21) 6 (0.62) 2 (0.21) 4 (0.42) 11.09 +2.09 (23.23%)
Brian Staunton M 23 8 10 62.81% 2 (0.22) 8 (0.90)   2 (0.22) 11.00 +3.00 (37.50%)
Zach Barter M 20 7 10 41.87%         7.80 +0.80 (11.43%)
Valdemar Nyrén M 17 4 8 26.30%   1 (0.27)     4.50 +0.50 (12.50%)
Errol Bullard S 24 10 13 72.16% 4 (0.39) 8 (0.78) 3 (0.29) 7 (0.68) 11.31 +1.31 (13.08%)
Dermot Grieves S 35 9 3 15.34% 1 (0.46) 4 (1.84)   1 (0.46) 9.67 +0.67 (7.41%)
Monty Beck S 19 5 9 44.10% 2 (0.32) 6 (0.96) 1 (0.16) 3 (0.48) 6.00 +1.00 (20.00%)
60.36% 21 67 19 40 9.81 + 1.21 (14.39%)
  1. Lounge Football Utd - Unholy Alliance (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Montreal Yo-yos - Lounge Football Utd (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Twin Peaks Rangers - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  4. The Federation - Lounge Football Utd (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  5. Lounge Football Utd - Bespoke (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Nam Town - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Lounge Football Utd - Nam Town (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  9. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Bespoke - Lounge Football Utd (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  11. Lounge Football Utd - The Federation (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Lounge Football Utd - Twin Peaks Rangers (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. Lounge Football Utd - Montreal Yo-yos (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  14. Unholy Alliance - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top