<

Overview :: AC Dingers

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Niall Keen K 26 10 10 66.23%         12.60 +2.60 (26.00%)
Leo Haydock K 18 5 5 32.62%         4.20 -0.80 (-16.00%)
Lewis Stamford D 25 12 13 85.03% 2 (0.17) 5 (0.42)   2 (0.17) 13.62 +1.62 (13.46%)
Kearney Hoult D 24 10 10 67.92%     1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 12.80 +2.80 (28.00%)
Patric WallĂ©n D 27 10 9 63.55%         13.00 +3.00 (30.00%)
Mathew Toms D 33 10 9 58.86%   1 (0.12)     13.89 +3.89 (38.89%)
Luther Beake D 19 6 7 49.42%         8.00 +2.00 (33.33%)
Jerrard Hopkins D 18 4 4 28.24%         4.25 +0.25 (6.25%)
Iosif Hrubaru M 24 12 13 91.79% 2 (0.15) 3 (0.23) 1 (0.08) 3 (0.23) 11.77 -0.23 (-1.92%)
Wes Parton M 27 11 12 84.73% 1 (0.08) 3 (0.25) 4 (0.33) 5 (0.42) 12.58 +1.58 (14.39%)
Matt Broomhall M 27 11 11 77.67% 3 (0.27) 6 (0.55)   3 (0.27) 11.18 +0.18 (1.65%)
Hank Pellock M 33 10 8 51.04% 1 (0.14) 3 (0.42) 1 (0.14) 2 (0.28) 11.62 +1.62 (16.25%)
Shawn Jeffers M 23 9 12 78.51%   4 (0.36)     10.25 +1.25 (13.89%)
Phil Tate M 21 8 9 61.09%   1 (0.12)     8.11 +0.11 (1.39%)
Olof Elovsson M 18 5 6 38.99%   1 (0.18)     5.67 +0.67 (13.33%)
Les Ellefson S 25 10 10 66.39% 2 (0.21) 7 (0.74) 2 (0.21) 4 (0.43) 12.70 +2.70 (27.00%)
Vitaly Vanyushin S 21 8 8 49.96%   3 (0.42) 1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 9.88 +1.88 (23.44%)
Maxwell Miles S 18 5 5 35.30% 1 (0.20) 3 (0.60)   1 (0.20) 5.60 +0.60 (12.00%)
60.41% 12 40 10 22 10.10 + 1.43 (15.63%)
  1. AC Dingers - The Federation (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Bespoke - AC Dingers (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. AC Dingers - Montreal Yo-yos (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  4. AC Dingers - Nam Town (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Unholy Alliance - AC Dingers (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Lounge Football Utd - AC Dingers (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  7. AC Dingers - Twin Peaks Rangers (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Twin Peaks Rangers - AC Dingers (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  9. AC Dingers - Lounge Football Utd (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. AC Dingers - Unholy Alliance (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  11. Nam Town - AC Dingers (0 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Montreal Yo-yos - AC Dingers (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. AC Dingers - Bespoke (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. The Federation - AC Dingers (6 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top