<

Overview :: The no hopers

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Victor Valença K 28 10 9 63.64%         9.33 -0.67 (-6.67%)
Jerry O´ Brien K 20 5 5 35.36%         4.20 -0.80 (-16.00%)
Cecil Sloan D 30 9 6 42.43%         5.83 -3.17 (-35.19%)
Tino Juanito D 25 8 14 92.93%   2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 7.14 -0.86 (-10.71%)
Mauro Holanda D 27 8 14 90.85%     1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 6.29 -1.71 (-21.43%)
Jamie Johnston D 25 8 6 42.43%   1 (0.17)     6.00 -2.00 (-25.00%)
Spence Sleath D 26 6 11 44.73%     1 (0.16) 1 (0.16) 5.82 -0.18 (-3.03%)
Dragos Florinciuc D 19 5 8 56.26%         3.88 -1.12 (-22.50%)
Dennis McIndoe D 19 4 6 41.43%         3.50 -0.50 (-12.50%)
Veríssimo Faro M 27 8 4 28.29% 1 (0.25) 3 (0.75)   1 (0.25) 5.50 -2.50 (-31.25%)
Aquiles Espina M 28 7 13 91.31%   5 (0.39) 2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 6.15 -0.85 (-12.09%)
David Browning M 28 7 8 48.96%         5.62 -1.38 (-19.64%)
Ken Entwhistle M 21 6 14 88.16% 3 (0.24) 14 (1.12)   3 (0.24) 4.93 -1.07 (-17.86%)
Fadzli Martini M 25 4 5 13.60%         4.00 -
Bert-Olof Höglund M 19 4 7 38.43%         3.14 -0.86 (-21.43%)
Joe Chapple M 18 4 13 79.63%   3 (0.27)     4.69 +0.69 (17.31%)
Hamilton Feeney S 28 8 5 30.05%         5.80 -2.20 (-27.50%)
Amos Von Dieter Eckersberg S 25 7 14 94.00% 3 (0.23) 11 (0.83)   3 (0.23) 5.64 -1.36 (-19.39%)
Fritz Fitz S 30 6 8 23.75%   1 (0.30)     5.62 -0.38 (-6.25%)
Yota Sasaki S 20 4 7 42.81%   2 (0.33)     3.57 -0.43 (-10.71%)
54.45% 7 42 6 13 5.33 -1.12 (-15.89%)
  1. The no hopers - Rammstein Lunatics (0 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Beamish Rovers - The no hopers (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  3. The no hopers - Solar Power (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-2-3]
  4. The no hopers - the crazy gang (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Boolean Algebra - The no hopers (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Chelsea Soul Boys FC - The no hopers (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. The no hopers - FC Barcelona (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  8. FC Barcelona - The no hopers (5 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. The no hopers - Chelsea Soul Boys FC (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. The no hopers - Boolean Algebra (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  11. the crazy gang - The no hopers (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  12. Solar Power - The no hopers (2 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 5-3-2]
  13. The no hopers - Beamish Rovers (2 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 3-4-3]
  14. Rammstein Lunatics - The no hopers (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top