<

Overview :: Lowland Heifers

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Adam Bach K 23 10 14 98.85%         11.21 +1.21 (12.14%)
Camilo Rocha D 23 10 12 73.37% 5 (0.48) 13 (1.25) 2 (0.19) 7 (0.67) 12.33 +2.33 (23.33%)
Kearney Halliwell D 26 10 12 82.19% 1 (0.09) 2 (0.17) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.17) 13.92 +3.92 (39.17%)
Rosie Dog D 25 9 11 66.69%   2 (0.21) 1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 12.64 +3.64 (40.40%)
Randy Cronan D 24 9 11 69.84%     1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 12.00 +3.00 (33.33%)
Paddy Huntington D 33 9 11 76.82%   1 (0.09)     11.73 +2.73 (30.30%)
Brandon Butler M 27 11 14 92.63% 2 (0.15) 7 (0.53)   2 (0.15) 12.50 +1.50 (13.64%)
Dwight Emerson M 23 10 12 79.05% 4 (0.36) 8 (0.71) 4 (0.36) 8 (0.71) 12.33 +2.33 (23.33%)
Hank Pursall M 31 9 12 84.73% 1 (0.08) 7 (0.58) 5 (0.42) 6 (0.50) 12.33 +3.33 (37.04%)
Leslie Bird M 23 9 11 73.14% 3 (0.29) 6 (0.58) 1 (0.10) 4 (0.39) 10.18 +1.18 (13.13%)
Julian Dunderdale M 22 8 10 65.54% 1 (0.11) 4 (0.43) 1 (0.11) 2 (0.22) 9.60 +1.60 (20.00%)
Tipo Negri M 23 8 11 76.21% 2 (0.19) 3 (0.28) 1 (0.09) 3 (0.28) 11.73 +3.73 (46.59%)
Colby Botham S 27 10 13 83.73% 8 (0.67) 21 (1.77) 1 (0.08) 9 (0.76) 12.38 +2.38 (23.85%)
Sem van Tassel S 21 7 10 64.54% 2 (0.22) 12 (1.31)   2 (0.22) 8.30 +1.30 (18.57%)
77.67% 29 86 18 47 11.66 + 2.44 (26.77%)
  1. Melchester Rovers - Lowland Heifers (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Lowland Heifers - Dark Destroyers (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. FC Xenon - Lowland Heifers (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. FC Durtyhoors - Lowland Heifers (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Lowland Heifers - Clemchester F.C (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Lowland Heifers - Lords of the Drinks (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Red Bull - Lowland Heifers (1 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Lowland Heifers - Red Bull (6 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  9. Lords of the Drinks - Lowland Heifers (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Clemchester F.C - Lowland Heifers (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Lowland Heifers - FC Durtyhoors (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Lowland Heifers - FC Xenon (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Dark Destroyers - Lowland Heifers (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  14. Lowland Heifers - Melchester Rovers (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top