<

Overview :: The Humble Plumb

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Jalen Burns K 28 12 8 55.76%         13.61 +1.61 (13.44%)
Danny Trott K 18 5 6 41.82%         3.92 -1.08 (-21.67%)
Arjen de Lange D 27 13 13 90.61% 1 (0.08) 2 (0.15) 1 (0.08) 2 (0.15) 14.37 +1.37 (10.53%)
Guifré Correa D 24 12 12 79.24%   1 (0.09) 3 (0.26) 3 (0.26) 13.82 +1.82 (15.14%)
Daniel Liemer D 21 9 11 75.38% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.18) 10.41 +1.41 (15.66%)
Teo Oliva D 20 8 9 50.98%         8.84 +0.84 (10.56%)
Martin Bolland D 19 7 8 52.27%         7.36 +0.36 (5.18%)
Darryl Lancaster M 29 13 13 90.61% 5 (0.38) 13 (1.00) 4 (0.31) 9 (0.69) 12.62 -0.38 (-2.90%)
Steven Challis M 33 13 11 76.67%   1 (0.09) 2 (0.18) 2 (0.18) 11.72 -1.28 (-9.86%)
Robbie Hawtin M 31 10 12 83.64% 1 (0.08) 6 (0.50) 6 (0.50) 7 (0.58) 11.51 +1.51 (15.08%)
Heiko Reder M 35 10 6 26.21%   1 (0.27)     10.80 +0.80 (8.00%)
Dorin Dumitra M 22 8 9 59.24% 1 (0.12) 3 (0.35)   1 (0.12) 9.26 +1.26 (15.69%)
Floriano Preto M 18 6 7 42.42% 1 (0.16) 1 (0.16)   1 (0.16) 7.40 +1.40 (23.33%)
Lúcio Proença M 17 5 7 46.36% 2 (0.30) 4 (0.60) 2 (0.30) 4 (0.60) 6.29 +1.29 (25.71%)
Antony Headon M 18 4 1 6.97%         6.40 +2.40 (60.00%)
Spencer Stokoe S 27 12 14 96.97% 8 (0.58) 17 (1.22) 1 (0.07) 9 (0.65) 14.54 +2.54 (21.19%)
Patrick Chopra S 32 10 7 36.89% 3 (0.57) 4 (0.76)   3 (0.57) 12.44 +2.44 (24.43%)
Jared Harper S 21 8 10 54.32% 1 (0.13) 4 (0.51)   1 (0.13) 8.83 +0.83 (10.38%)
59.24% 24 58 20 44 10.23 + 1.06 (13.33%)
  1. The Humble Plumb - ROW Nippon (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang - The Humble Plumb (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  3. S.L. Benfica - The Humble Plumb (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  4. The Humble Plumb - Alba an Aigh (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  5. ROE Kick And Run FC - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. The Humble Plumb - NA Sporting KC SC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. ROW Nippon - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  8. The Humble Plumb - ROW Nippon (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. NA Sporting KC SC - The Humble Plumb (3 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. The Crooked Spireites - The Humble Plumb (2 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  11. The Humble Plumb - ROE Kick And Run FC (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Alba an Aigh - The Humble Plumb (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. The Humble Plumb - ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. The Cricketers Arms - The Humble Plumb (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top