<

Overview :: ROE Viking Barbarians

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Stid Castillo K 31 14 19 89.42%         15.77 +1.77 (12.63%)
Ilie Soarece K 18 4   1 4.77%         2.20 -1.80 (-45.00%)
Jordi Enrique D 30 14 15 64.32%     2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 16.51 +2.51 (17.95%)
Lui Roberto D 30 14 19 87.19% 1 (0.05) 4 (0.22)   1 (0.05) 15.41 +2.19 (16.95%)
Isaac Munro D 28 13 18 82.78% 9 (0.52) 16 (0.92) 2 (0.12) 11 (0.63) 15.31 +2.31 (17.78%)
Feliciano Manel D 28 12 18 78.37%   1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 13.71 +2.48 (22.41%)
Cesar Pellerano D 37 6 2 5.91%   1 (0.81)     7.55 +1.55 (25.83%)
Birger Klintheim D 17 4 2 9.54%         3.95 -0.05 (-1.25%)
Jochen Petzold D 18 4 7 29.77%     1 (0.16) 1 (0.16) 4.29 +0.29 (7.14%)
Lorenzo Giojoso M 29 14 17 72.77% 3 (0.20) 9 (0.59) 4 (0.26) 7 (0.46) 15.08 +1.96 (15.07%)
Semir Caluk M 27 14 17 75.41% 3 (0.19) 6 (0.38) 3 (0.19) 6 (0.38) 14.50 +0.50 (3.57%)
Damian Dima M 29 13 15 66.65% 3 (0.21) 7 (0.50) 5 (0.36) 8 (0.57) 13.81 +1.54 (12.85%)
Juan José Butragueno M 25 11 20 94.29%   8 (0.40) 7 (0.35) 7 (0.35) 11.99 +1.79 (17.77%)
Nestor Vicente M 36 10 11 49.59% 4 (0.38) 4 (0.38) 3 (0.29) 7 (0.67) 11.47 +1.47 (14.73%)
Kalle Hellborg M 19 5 7 14.37%     1 (0.33) 1 (0.33) 5.60 +0.60 (12.00%)
Silvio van der Eelst M 19 5 9 27.75%         4.29 -0.04 (-0.39%)
Nikolas Borgkvist M 19 4 3 14.32%         2.73 -1.27 (-31.67%)
Bráulio Norte S 28 15 17 78.22% 16 (0.98) 24 (1.46) 3 (0.18) 19 (1.16) 15.89 +1.65 (11.63%)
Cameron Greenman S 26 12 16 70.80% 8 (0.54) 17 (1.15) 2 (0.13) 10 (0.67) 13.04 +1.79 (15.97%)
Elba Campagnolo S 33 11 11 33.56% 2 (0.28) 7 (1.00)   2 (0.28) 11.66 +0.66 (6.03%)
52.49% 49 104 34 83 10.74 + 1.09 ( 7.60%)
  1. The Cricketers Arms - ROE Viking Barbarians (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  2. ROE Viking Barbarians - ROW Warriors (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Conspiracy 58 - ROE Viking Barbarians (2 - 4) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Vitória de Guimarães - ROE Viking Barbarians (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  5. ROE Viking Barbarians - The Mucky Duck (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  6. ROW Nippon - ROE Viking Barbarians (3 - 4) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  7. FC Botosani - ROE Viking Barbarians (1 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  8. ROE Viking Barbarians - FC Botosani (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Smiling Gargoyles - ROE Viking Barbarians (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. The Mucky Duck - ROE Viking Barbarians (2 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  11. ROE Viking Barbarians - Vitória de Guimarães (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Iacobini - ROE Viking Barbarians (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. ROW Warriors - ROE Viking Barbarians (0 - 4) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. ROE Viking Barbarians - The Cricketers Arms (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. ROE Viking Barbarians - ROE Rock Me Amadeus (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. The Bermuda Triangle - ROE Viking Barbarians (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  17. ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang - ROE Viking Barbarians (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  18. ROE Viking Barbarians - Purple Haze (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  19. ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang - ROE Viking Barbarians (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  20. ROE Viking Barbarians - Purple Haze (4 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top