<

Overview :: FC Rapid Bucuresti

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Catalin Straton K 29 16 12 99.10%         18.00 +2.00 (12.50%)
Valerica Gaman D 30 15 11 75.85% 2 (0.22) 2 (0.22)   2 (0.22) 17.82 +2.82 (18.79%)
Marcos Antonio D 30 14 9 71.18%         18.11 +4.11 (29.37%)
Vladimir Bozovici D 26 13 7 46.41%   1 (0.18) 1 (0.18) 1 (0.18) 15.86 +2.86 (21.98%)
Sergio Ramos D 23 9 9 39.14% 1 (0.21) 1 (0.21) 2 (0.42) 3 (0.63) 10.22 +1.22 (13.58%)
Marcelo Vieira D 22 9 6 38.96%         10.67 +1.67 (18.52%)
Ashley Cole D 18 5 9 42.28%         6.22 +1.22 (24.44%)
Ciprian Deac M 30 15 10 73.43% 5 (0.56) 11 (1.24) 5 (0.56) 10 (1.12) 18.10 +3.10 (20.67%)
Constantin Budescu M 30 15 11 81.42% 3 (0.30) 5 (0.51) 3 (0.30) 6 (0.61) 18.36 +3.36 (22.42%)
Marius Alexe M 30 15 11 77.56% 5 (0.53) 11 (1.17) 8 (0.85) 13 (1.38) 17.55 +2.55 (16.97%)
Ovidiu Herea M 31 15 10 73.07% 6 (0.68) 13 (1.47) 3 (0.34) 9 (1.02) 18.40 +3.40 (22.67%)
Di Maria M 23 10 11 74.33% 2 (0.22) 4 (0.44)   2 (0.22) 12.36 +2.36 (23.64%)
Nicolae Grigore M 23 9 11 55.12%   1 (0.15) 3 (0.45) 3 (0.45) 11.18 +2.18 (24.24%)
Cristiano Aveiro Ronaldo M 19 8 10 52.33% 1 (0.16) 2 (0.32) 1 (0.16) 2 (0.32) 9.10 +1.10 (13.75%)
Daniel Pancu S 30 14 10 71.63% 6 (0.69) 10 (1.15) 4 (0.46) 10 (1.15) 16.60 +2.60 (18.57%)
Mihai Costea S 30 12 11 65.35% 3 (0.38) 8 (1.01) 1 (0.13) 4 (0.51) 14.55 +2.55 (21.21%)
Mario Balotelli S 23 9 10 53.05% 3 (0.47) 5 (0.78) 1 (0.16) 4 (0.62) 10.90 +1.90 (21.11%)
64.13% 37 74 32 69 14.35 + 2.41 (20.26%)
  1. ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. FC Rapid Bucuresti - Purple Haze (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Beinn Nibheis - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. FC Young Guns - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 4) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  5. FC Rapid Bucuresti - ROE Most Wanted (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Steaua Bucuresti - FC Rapid Bucuresti (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. The Humble Plumb - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  8. FC Rapid Bucuresti - The Humble Plumb (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  9. ROE Most Wanted - FC Rapid Bucuresti (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. FC Rapid Bucuresti - FC Young Guns (8 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  11. Purple Haze - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  12. FC Rapid Bucuresti - ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top