<

Overview :: Butterfly Effect

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Arthur Parfitt K 32 15 18 93.45% 4 (0.22) 6 (0.33) 1 (0.06) 5 (0.28) 17.89 +2.89 (19.26%)
Gustavo Lipo D 27 15 17 88.26% 4 (0.24) 5 (0.29) 2 (0.12) 6 (0.35) 17.94 +2.94 (19.61%)
Gottfried Weidner D 24 13 15 74.83%     2 (0.14) 2 (0.14) 15.20 +2.20 (16.92%)
Jurjen Halse D 23 12 9 45.43%         11.67 -0.33 (-2.78%)
Eric Clayton D 23 11 12 60.16%   1 (0.09) 2 (0.17) 2 (0.17) 13.33 +2.33 (21.21%)
Gimi Minciunescu D 22 9 6 27.26%         10.17 +1.17 (12.96%)
Ugo De Patre M 27 14 18 93.45% 2 (0.11) 6 (0.33) 8 (0.44) 10 (0.56) 14.61 +0.61 (4.37%)
Ângelo Céu M 24 12 14 72.69% 3 (0.21) 9 (0.64) 2 (0.14) 5 (0.36) 14.14 +2.14 (17.86%)
Matias Boa M 27 12 16 83.07%   5 (0.31) 10 (0.62) 10 (0.62) 14.62 +2.62 (21.87%)
Domenico Martin M 25 12 14 72.69% 2 (0.14) 8 (0.57) 5 (0.36) 7 (0.50) 14.14 +2.14 (17.86%)
Alexandru Secu M 24 12 13 60.10% 2 (0.17) 4 (0.35) 2 (0.17) 4 (0.35) 12.92 +0.92 (7.69%)
Dermid McInnes M 23 9 7 30.76% 5 (0.84) 12 (2.03)   5 (0.84) 10.29 +1.29 (14.29%)
Derrick Rose M 18 5 5 25.96% 2 (0.40) 4 (0.80)   2 (0.40) 4.60 -0.40 (-8.00%)
Damian Zanfir M 19 5 5 23.36% 1 (0.22) 3 (0.67) 1 (0.22) 2 (0.44) 5.60 +0.60 (12.00%)
Theodore Speed S 25 14 14 67.49% 5 (0.38) 12 (0.92) 2 (0.15) 7 (0.54) 14.71 +0.71 (5.10%)
Ignacio Gañán S 26 12 15 69.92% 14 (1.04) 24 (1.78) 3 (0.22) 17 (1.26) 12.27 +0.27 (2.22%)
Adolf Manske S 24 11 6 21.73% 1 (0.24) 4 (0.96)   1 (0.24) 12.00 +1.00 (9.09%)
Luciano Girão S 19 6 4 17.38% 4 (1.19) 4 (1.19)   4 (1.19) 6.00 -
57.11% 49 107 40 89 12.34 + 1.36 (11.27%)
  1. ROW Warriors - Butterfly Effect (0 - 3) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Butterfly Effect - ROE Kick And Run FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Bannockburn - Butterfly Effect (1 - 4) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Bannockburn - Butterfly Effect (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  5. Butterfly Effect - FC Botosani (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Butterfly Effect - The Rothschilds (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. Butterfly Effect - U Cluj (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  8. U Cluj - Butterfly Effect (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  9. U Cluj - Butterfly Effect (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  10. FC Botosani - Butterfly Effect (0 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  11. Butterfly Effect - Bannockburn (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Butterfly Effect - Cowboy United (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. ROE Kick And Run FC - Butterfly Effect (0 - 5) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  14. Butterfly Effect - ROW Warriors (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  15. Butterfly Effect - FC Rapid Bucuresti (4 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Butterfly Effect - Portugal United (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Butterfly Effect - Steaua Bucuresti (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  18. FC Petrolul Ploiesti - Butterfly Effect (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top