<

Overview :: FC Rapid Bucuresti

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Catalin Straton K 30 16 18 95.89%         17.56 +1.56 (9.72%)
Valerica Gaman D 31 15 17 87.90% 2 (0.12) 2 (0.12) 1 (0.06) 3 (0.18) 18.24 +3.24 (21.57%)
Marcos Antonio D 31 14 15 74.64%   1 (0.07) 2 (0.14) 2 (0.14) 17.93 +3.93 (28.10%)
Vladimir Bozovici D 27 13 13 57.79% 1 (0.09) 2 (0.18) 2 (0.18) 3 (0.28) 16.23 +3.23 (24.85%)
Sergio Ramos D 24 10 13 47.83%   1 (0.11) 2 (0.22) 2 (0.22) 11.77 +1.77 (17.69%)
Marcelo Vieira D 23 10 9 32.25%     3 (0.50) 3 (0.50) 11.22 +1.22 (12.22%)
Ashley Cole D 19 7 4 13.90%         8.50 +1.50 (21.43%)
Ovidiu Herea M 32 16 18 93.46% 15 (0.86) 24 (1.37) 5 (0.29) 20 (1.14) 18.56 +2.56 (15.97%)
Ciprian Deac M 31 16 15 77.48% 7 (0.48) 11 (0.76) 7 (0.48) 14 (0.96) 17.87 +1.87 (11.67%)
Marius Alexe M 31 15 17 76.61% 6 (0.42) 11 (0.76) 5 (0.35) 11 (0.76) 16.94 +1.94 (12.94%)
Constantin Budescu M 31 15 4 21.31% 2 (0.50) 2 (0.50) 4 (1.00) 6 (1.50) 18.50 +3.50 (23.33%)
Di Maria M 24 11 13 56.11% 2 (0.19) 3 (0.28) 6 (0.57) 8 (0.76) 13.69 +2.69 (24.48%)
Nicolae Grigore M 24 10 11 38.27% 1 (0.14) 3 (0.42) 3 (0.42) 4 (0.56) 12.27 +2.27 (22.73%)
Cristiano Aveiro Ronaldo M 20 9 12 48.00%   1 (0.11) 3 (0.33) 3 (0.33) 11.08 +2.08 (23.15%)
Felipe Teixeira M 17 4 11 42.33%     1 (0.13) 1 (0.13) 4.55 +0.55 (13.64%)
Daniel Pancu S 31 15 18 81.99% 18 (1.17) 27 (1.75) 1 (0.06) 19 (1.23) 17.17 +2.17 (14.44%)
Mihai Costea S 31 13 18 78.58% 10 (0.68) 18 (1.22) 9 (0.61) 19 (1.29) 15.33 +2.33 (17.95%)
Mario Balotelli S 24 10 12 31.85% 6 (1.00) 9 (1.51)   6 (1.00) 12.25 +2.25 (22.50%)
58.68% 70 115 54 124 14.43 + 2.26 (18.80%)
  1. ROE Norwegian Scousers - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 7) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  2. FC Rapid Bucuresti - Portugal 1 (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. FRB Utd - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. ROW HAL Allstars - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 6) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  5. FC Rapid Bucuresti - ROW Nippon (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. FC Rapid Bucuresti - The Humble Plumb (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. The Bermuda Triangle - FC Rapid Bucuresti (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  8. FC Rapid Bucuresti - The Bermuda Triangle (5 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  9. Portugal United - FC Rapid Bucuresti (5 - 7) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. ROW Nippon - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. FC Rapid Bucuresti - Men in Black (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  12. Beinn Nibheis - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. FC Karaduva - FC Rapid Bucuresti (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  14. FC Rapid Bucuresti - ROE Norwegian Scousers (7 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  15. Butterfly Effect - FC Rapid Bucuresti (4 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Majestic 12 - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  17. S.L. Benfica - FC Rapid Bucuresti (2 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Alcantara C.P. - FC Rapid Bucuresti (2 - 4) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top