<

Overview :: ROE Kick And Run FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Gene Hardings K 18 8 18 99.82%         4.94 -3.06 (-38.19%)
Pablito Sola D 20 7 18 96.20% 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12)   1 (0.06) 5.28 -1.72 (-24.60%)
Nobo Wibowo D 32 6 12 59.92%   1 (0.09)     3.42 -2.58 (-43.06%)
Jeffery Mahony D 18 6 18 97.05%   1 (0.06)     3.83 -2.17 (-36.11%)
Geo Buia D 18 5 18 83.00%         4.67 -0.33 (-6.67%)
Duncan Krest D 16 4 14 57.56%         3.14 -0.86 (-21.43%)
Montes Zacchei M 32 12 13 69.32%   1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 7.15 -4.85 (-40.38%)
Vuk Pejinovic M 18 7 18 90.42%   3 (0.18) 2 (0.12) 2 (0.12) 5.06 -1.94 (-27.78%)
Bo Bian M 18 7 18 78.18%   2 (0.14) 1 (0.07) 1 (0.07) 5.11 -1.89 (-26.98%)
Josefino Pessoa M 31 6 8 35.08% 1 (0.16) 2 (0.32)   1 (0.16) 6.00 -
Jeremie Daltrey M 18 5 17 64.14% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09)   1 (0.09) 4.59 -0.41 (-8.24%)
Stanislau Lukashonak M 16 4 12 34.42%   1 (0.16)     3.67 -0.33 (-8.33%)
David Robu M 17 4 10 49.91%     1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 3.00 -1.00 (-25.00%)
Idowu Yobe S 18 6 18 91.26% 1 (0.06) 6 (0.36)   1 (0.06) 4.56 -1.44 (-24.07%)
Majid Tarok S 17 6 18 87.94% 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06)   1 (0.06) 4.33 -1.67 (-27.78%)
Guilbur Gonzalo S 31 6   1 3.80%         5.00 -1.00 (-16.67%)
68.63% 5 21 5 10 4.61 -1.68 (-25.02%)
  1. Bannockburn - ROE Kick And Run FC (6 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Butterfly Effect - ROE Kick And Run FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. ROE Kick And Run FC - The Lumbertubs (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. ROE Kick And Run FC - U Cluj (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. ROE Kick And Run FC - ROW Warriors (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. ROE Kick And Run FC - FC Botosani (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. FC Botosani - ROE Kick And Run FC (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  8. ROW Warriors - ROE Kick And Run FC (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  9. U Cluj - ROE Kick And Run FC (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. ROE Kick And Run FC - Butterfly Effect (0 - 5) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  11. ROE Kick And Run FC - Bannockburn (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Bannockburn - ROE Kick And Run FC (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  13. ROE Rock Me Amadeus - ROE Kick And Run FC (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. ROE Kick And Run FC - ROE Rock Me Amadeus (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. ROE Rock Me Amadeus - ROE Kick And Run FC (6 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. ROE Rock Me Amadeus - ROE Kick And Run FC (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  17. ROE Kick And Run FC - ROE Rock Me Amadeus (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  18. ROE Rock Me Amadeus - ROE Kick And Run FC (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top