<

Overview :: ROM Zimbrul Siret

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Keith Knox K 38 15 20 73.91% 2 (0.10) 2 (0.10)   2 (0.10) 16.05 +1.05 (7.00%)
Tyson Watson K 18 5   6 21.97%         4.50 -0.50 (-10.00%)
Alex Lupoian D 34 14 17 62.82% 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12) 3 (0.18) 15.76 +1.76 (12.61%)
Håkan Aldengran D 28 12 16 57.65%         14.94 +2.94 (24.48%)
Tonie Persson D 26 12 23 80.99% 1 (0.05) 19 (0.90) 2 (0.09) 3 (0.14) 13.43 +1.43 (11.96%)
Simon Walker D 22 10 11 38.93%     1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 11.27 +1.27 (12.73%)
Peter Lundvik D 22 10 12 45.10%     1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 10.42 +0.42 (4.17%)
Cristi Ilie D 22 9 10 36.47%         10.40 +1.40 (15.56%)
Petike Vírág D 18 5 6 19.34%     1 (0.20) 1 (0.20) 5.83 +0.83 (16.67%)
Silviu-Iulian Istrate M 33 15 20 71.70% 9 (0.48) 15 (0.80) 9 (0.48) 18 (0.96) 16.70 +1.70 (11.33%)
Sandu Cosmin-Ionut M 34 15 21 75.74% 8 (0.41) 12 (0.61) 10 (0.51) 18 (0.91) 15.52 +0.52 (3.49%)
Nath Coles M 26 13 21 76.74% 4 (0.20) 8 (0.40) 3 (0.15) 7 (0.35) 13.95 +0.95 (7.33%)
David Vickers M 25 13 20 76.70% 7 (0.35) 14 (0.70) 6 (0.30) 13 (0.65) 15.95 +2.95 (22.69%)
Christian Steiner M 24 11 19 72.86% 5 (0.26) 12 (0.63) 2 (0.11) 7 (0.37) 13.26 +2.26 (20.57%)
Pál Ólay M 20 7 11 38.72% 2 (0.20) 5 (0.50) 4 (0.40) 6 (0.59) 8.91 +1.91 (27.27%)
Farkas Kolbászos M 18 6 12 40.56% 2 (0.19) 5 (0.47) 2 (0.19) 4 (0.38) 7.08 +1.08 (18.06%)
Tamás Németh M 18 5 6 22.59% 1 (0.17) 5 (0.85)   1 (0.17) 6.83 +1.83 (36.67%)
Reinaldo Araújo S 34 14 15 57.52% 8 (0.53) 19 (1.27) 3 (0.20) 11 (0.73) 15.40 +1.40 (10.00%)
Shinozu Koon S 26 12 15 55.98% 4 (0.27) 15 (1.03) 2 (0.14) 6 (0.41) 14.33 +2.33 (19.44%)
Imre Piros S 17 5 8 28.39% 5 (0.68) 9 (1.22) 2 (0.27) 7 (0.95) 6.38 +1.38 (27.50%)
52.73% 59 141 50 109 11.85 + 1.45 (14.98%)
  1. ROE Norwegian Scousers - U Cluj (0 - 6) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. U Cluj - ROW MXL Malaysia (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  3. The Walking Dead - U Cluj (4 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. U Cluj - Men in Black (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Madredeus - U Cluj (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  6. ROM Zimbrul Siret - Bannockburn (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Haggis Hunters - ROM Zimbrul Siret (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  8. ROM Zimbrul Siret - ROW Tai Po FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. ROM Zimbrul Siret - ROM Expert (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Conspiracy 58 - ROM Zimbrul Siret (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. ROM Saint Étienne - ROM Zimbrul Siret (1 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  12. ROM Zimbrul Siret - Conspiracy 58 (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  13. ROM Expert - ROM Zimbrul Siret (1 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. ROM Zimbrul Siret - Majestic 12 (4 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  15. ROM Zimbrul Siret - Haggis Hunters (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Bannockburn - ROM Zimbrul Siret (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. The Rothschilds - ROM Zimbrul Siret (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  18. ROM Zimbrul Siret - Madredeus (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  19. Men in Black - ROM Zimbrul Siret (0 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  20. ROM Zimbrul Siret - The Walking Dead (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  21. ROW Australia - ROM Zimbrul Siret (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  22. ROM Zimbrul Siret - ROE Norwegian Scousers (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  23. Barcode 666 - ROM Zimbrul Siret (1 - 4) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  24. ROM Zimbrul Siret - ROM Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  25. ROM Zimbrul Siret - ROM Botosani (5 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top