<

Overview :: ROW Tai Po FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Vilhelm Møllegård K 22 10 20 98.98%         9.90 -0.10 (-1.00%)
Ovídio César D 25 12 19 94.03%   1 (0.05) 2 (0.11) 2 (0.11) 13.84 +1.84 (15.35%)
Steven Bassett D 29 12 17 76.60%   2 (0.13) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 13.53 +1.53 (12.75%)
Tahir Yavas D 20 8 14 52.50%         9.29 +1.29 (16.07%)
Bento Rafael D 21 8 17 77.73%     1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 8.53 +0.53 (6.62%)
Tore Falch-Olsen D 19 7 12 56.80%         7.75 +0.75 (10.71%)
Gonçalo Vitória D 17 5 9 33.30%         4.44 -0.56 (-11.11%)
Darwin Doni M 27 15 18 80.47%   5 (0.31) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 14.72 -0.28 (-1.85%)
Hang Jebat M 33 14 15 72.62% 4 (0.27) 8 (0.55) 3 (0.20) 7 (0.48) 16.20 +2.20 (15.71%)
Sang Kelembai M 33 13 17 83.06% 2 (0.12) 9 (0.54) 1 (0.06) 3 (0.18) 15.82 +2.82 (21.72%)
Justino Ravara M 29 13 19 92.79% 1 (0.05) 6 (0.32) 2 (0.11) 3 (0.16) 15.32 +2.32 (17.81%)
Darth Sidious M 23 10 18 79.51% 2 (0.12) 3 (0.19) 4 (0.25) 6 (0.37) 12.06 +2.06 (20.56%)
Hélder Vilhena M 17 5 9 27.06%     1 (0.18) 1 (0.18) 6.11 +1.11 (22.22%)
Hang Tuah S 28 14 20 98.60% 16 (0.80) 33 (1.66) 1 (0.05) 17 (0.85) 14.60 +0.60 (4.29%)
Joaquim Merino S 19 7 12 40.13% 1 (0.12) 5 (0.62)   1 (0.12) 7.67 +0.67 (9.52%)
Alex Novaes S 17 4 9 24.58%     2 (0.40) 2 (0.40) 4.56 +0.56 (13.89%)
68.05% 26 72 19 45 10.90 + 1.08 (10.83%)
  1. ROE Viking Barbarians - ROW Tai Po FC (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. ROW Tai Po FC - ROW MXL Malaysia (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. ROE Kick And Run FC - ROW Tai Po FC (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Barcode 666 - ROW Tai Po FC (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  5. ROW Tai Po FC - New World Order (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  6. ROW Tai Po FC - Portugal United (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. ROM Steaua Bucuresti - ROW Tai Po FC (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. ROW Tai Po FC - ROE Maltese Falcon (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. ROM Zimbrul Siret - ROW Tai Po FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Alcantara C. P. - ROW Tai Po FC (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. ROW Tai Po FC - Purple Haze (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Purple Haze - ROW Tai Po FC (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  13. ROW Tai Po FC - Alcantara C. P. (0 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  14. ROE Maltese Falcon - ROW Tai Po FC (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. ROW Tai Po FC - ROM Steaua Bucuresti (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  16. Portugal United - ROW Tai Po FC (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. New World Order - ROW Tai Po FC (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  18. ROW Tai Po FC - Barcode 666 (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  19. ROW Tai Po FC - ROE Kick And Run FC (4 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  20. ROW Tai Po FC - ROE Viking Barbarians (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top