<

Overview :: ROE Pdl Crew

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Sangri Tchetina K 34 12 18 99.58% 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.11) 3 (0.17) 12.39 +0.39 (3.24%)
Tomas Glava D 31 13 9 43.48% 1 (0.13) 2 (0.25) 2 (0.25) 3 (0.38) 12.11 -0.89 (-6.84%)
Cira Drugi D 25 12 17 94.05%         12.00 -
Bruce Pilling D 23 10 4 22.13%     1 (0.25) 1 (0.25) 10.00 -
Davors Razbojnik D 22 9 15 82.98%         8.07 -0.93 (-10.37%)
Kendrick Bennet D 18 6 15 82.98%         5.87 -0.13 (-2.22%)
Abe McBrain M 32 12 14 77.45% 1 (0.07) 2 (0.14)   1 (0.07) 8.64 -3.36 (-27.98%)
Tommy Istina M 33 12 5 22.61%     2 (0.49) 2 (0.49) 13.20 +1.20 (10.00%)
Darko Darkmyt M 27 12 5 27.66% 1 (0.20) 7 (1.40)   1 (0.20) 12.00 -
Saja Metalac M 25 11 17 94.05% 5 (0.29) 8 (0.47) 2 (0.12) 7 (0.41) 12.59 +1.59 (14.44%)
Jon Ball M 22 10 4 22.13%     1 (0.25) 1 (0.25) 10.00 -
Neno Kdn M 22 9 16 88.51% 1 (0.06) 3 (0.19) 2 (0.12) 3 (0.19) 9.81 +0.81 (9.03%)
Soil Work M 21 8 16 88.03%   1 (0.06) 2 (0.13) 2 (0.13) 6.69 -1.31 (-16.41%)
Lerga Superhik S 32 12 16 88.51% 3 (0.19) 9 (0.56) 1 (0.06) 4 (0.25) 13.00 +1.00 (8.33%)
Sule General S 24 10 15 78.23% 4 (0.28) 8 (0.57) 1 (0.07) 5 (0.35) 10.60 +0.60 (6.00%)
Andy Shane S 20 6 15 82.98% 1 (0.07) 1 (0.07)   1 (0.07) 4.80 -1.20 (-20.00%)
68.46% 18 42 16 34 10.11 -0.19 (-2.73%)
  1. Barcode 666 - ROE Pdl Crew (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. ROM Zimbrul Siret - ROE Pdl Crew (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  3. ROE Pdl Crew - ROM Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. ROE Pdl Crew - ROE Rock Me Amadeus (6 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  5. ROE Pdl Crew - ROM Botosani (5 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Smiling Gargoyles - ROE Pdl Crew (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  7. The Walking Dead - ROE Pdl Crew (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  8. Bannockburn - ROE Pdl Crew (5 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-4-3]
  9. ROE Pdl Crew - ROM Evilution (4 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  10. ROE Pdl Crew - Haggis Hunters (2 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Haggis Hunters - ROE Pdl Crew (7 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  12. ROM Evilution - ROE Pdl Crew (6 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  13. ROE Pdl Crew - Bannockburn (0 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  14. ROE Pdl Crew - Smiling Gargoyles (0 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  15. ROM Botosani - ROE Pdl Crew (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  16. ROE Rock Me Amadeus - ROE Pdl Crew (6 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-4-3]
  17. ROM Rapid Bucuresti - ROE Pdl Crew (6 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  18. ROE Pdl Crew - ROM Zimbrul Siret (0 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top