<

Overview :: Bannockburn

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Floriano Lagoa K 33 12 8 44.15%   2 (0.25)     15.00 +3.00 (25.00%)
Janick Barber K 22 7 10 55.19%         7.90 +0.90 (12.86%)
Lawrie McAnespie D 32 13 14 71.75%     2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 16.00 +3.00 (23.08%)
Murdo Millar D 29 12 10 41.93%   5 (0.66) 1 (0.13) 1 (0.13) 14.20 +2.20 (18.33%)
Lewis Herriot D 25 12 15 82.78% 5 (0.33) 7 (0.47) 4 (0.27) 9 (0.60) 15.67 +3.67 (30.56%)
Thomas Billington D 28 11 11 57.65%         11.00 -
Kieran Gardiner D 23 10 12 66.23%   1 (0.08) 3 (0.25) 3 (0.25) 11.58 +1.58 (15.83%)
Matei Brânzã D 21 7 13 60.95%   2 (0.18) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 8.92 +1.92 (27.47%)
Lawrence Irvine D 19 6 10 43.91%     1 (0.13) 1 (0.13) 7.40 +1.40 (23.33%)
Davy Philbin M 32 13 15 79.30% 9 (0.63) 20 (1.39) 3 (0.21) 12 (0.84) 14.47 +1.47 (11.28%)
Archie Eastwood M 24 12 15 75.04% 3 (0.22) 9 (0.66) 4 (0.29) 7 (0.51) 13.53 +1.53 (12.78%)
Colbert Hogg M 32 12 15 79.84% 3 (0.21) 12 (0.83) 5 (0.35) 8 (0.55) 14.07 +2.07 (17.22%)
Kendrick Maxfield M 21 9 15 80.14% 4 (0.28) 7 (0.48) 1 (0.07) 5 (0.34) 9.33 +0.33 (3.70%)
Eugénio Varinho M 20 6 2 11.04%         6.50 +0.50 (8.33%)
Allen MacCrain M 17 5 10 52.25%   3 (0.32) 2 (0.21) 2 (0.21) 7.20 +2.20 (44.00%)
Ainsley Glasgow M 18 5 9 47.09% 1 (0.12) 5 (0.59)   1 (0.12) 6.67 +1.67 (33.33%)
Euan Keeter S 33 12 6 33.11% 1 (0.17) 5 (0.83) 1 (0.17) 2 (0.33) 13.50 +1.50 (12.50%)
Dick Gaye S 21 8 15 70.85% 4 (0.31) 8 (0.62) 1 (0.08) 5 (0.39) 7.93 -0.07 (-0.83%)
Teigh Flett S 19 6 10 39.53% 2 (0.28) 3 (0.42)   2 (0.28) 6.10 +0.10 (1.67%)
57.51% 32 89 29 61 10.89 + 1.61 (17.80%)
  1. Bannockburn - ROM Evilution (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Bannockburn - Haggis Hunters (6 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  3. Barcode 666 - Bannockburn (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  4. ROM Zimbrul Siret - Bannockburn (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  5. Bannockburn - ROM Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  6. ROE Rock Me Amadeus - Bannockburn (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  7. Bannockburn - ROE Pdl Crew (5 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-4-3]
  8. Smiling Gargoyles - Bannockburn (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  9. ROW Perak - Bannockburn (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Bannockburn - ROM Botosani (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  11. ROM Botosani - Bannockburn (1 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Bannockburn - Smiling Gargoyles (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  13. ROE Pdl Crew - Bannockburn (0 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Bannockburn - ROE Rock Me Amadeus (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  15. ROM Rapid Bucuresti - Bannockburn (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Bannockburn - ROM Zimbrul Siret (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Bannockburn - Barcode 666 (2 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-3-3]
  18. Haggis Hunters - Bannockburn (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top