<

Overview :: 40 Commando

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Zydrunas Köller K 27 9 6 42.46%         11.95 +2.12 (21.15%)
Caleb Spector K 26 8 8 56.62%         7.20 -0.80 (-10.00%)
Quieto Baiocco D 27 10 13 91.54%   1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 9.88 -0.12 (-1.15%)
Juan-María Aramburu D 27 9 13 89.69% 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 1 (0.08) 2 (0.16) 8.04 -0.73 (-7.75%)
Miguel Mântua D 32 6 10 58.92%         5.84 -0.16 (-2.67%)
Zac Gotterson D 21 6 10 67.85% 1 (0.10) 1 (0.10)   1 (0.10) 4.66 -1.14 (-18.20%)
Jed Badger D 20 6 9 57.08%         7.09 +0.20 (3.23%)
Julius Dye M 21 9 14 99.08% 2 (0.14) 5 (0.36) 2 (0.14) 4 (0.29) 8.23 -0.56 (-6.15%)
Gabriel Shields M 25 9 13 92.00% 5 (0.38) 14 (1.08)   5 (0.38) 8.82 +0.05 (0.76%)
Bogoljub Drobnjakovic M 26 8 13 92.00% 1 (0.08) 6 (0.46)   1 (0.08) 7.73 -0.27 (-3.37%)
Vico Colombo M 33 6 11 77.85%   2 (0.18) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 5.14 -0.86 (-14.39%)
Stuart Wheatman M 19 5 5 35.38%   1 (0.20)     4.46 -0.54 (-10.80%)
Fortunato Remédios M 18 4 7 49.54%     3 (0.43) 3 (0.43) 3.66 -0.34 (-8.57%)
Sondre Skjærven S 33 9 13 92.00% 3 (0.23) 9 (0.69)   3 (0.23) 9.48 +0.48 (5.30%)
Leroy Tully S 20 6 12 80.92%   4 (0.35)     5.07 -0.68 (-11.00%)
Peyton Simon S 33 6 2 6.92%         4.00 -2.00 (-33.33%)
68.12% 13 44 8 21 6.95 -0.33 (-6.06%)
  1. 40 Commando - Inbetweeners (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. FFS FC - 40 Commando (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. 40 Commando - Volcanic Brasov (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. 40 Commando - Total Dovoria (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. 40 Commando - Felixstowe Flyers (2 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Watford - 40 Commando (0 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  7. The Red Knights - 40 Commando (3 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  8. 40 Commando - The Red Knights (0 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. 40 Commando - Watford (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Felixstowe Flyers - 40 Commando (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  11. Total Dovoria - 40 Commando (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Volcanic Brasov - 40 Commando (1 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  13. 40 Commando - FFS FC (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  14. Inbetweeners - 40 Commando (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top