<

Overview :: Fat Dog Big Rovers res

 >
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Frederico Campilho K 32 11 98 62.99%         9.85 -0.77 (-7.47%)
Jo Markussen K 30 8 7 3.72%         6.53 -1.47 (-18.39%)
Jordan Tillery K 30 7 34 21.69%         6.09 -0.91 (-13.07%)
Tuncay Gün K 31 5 1 0.44%         3.80 -1.20 (-24.00%)
Bento Galvão D 33 10 143 92.25% 4 (0.03) 32 (0.23) 30 (0.21) 34 (0.24) 10.49 +0.52 (5.53%)
Finn-Arne Zachariassen D 28 9 129 82.88% 4 (0.03) 14 (0.11) 9 (0.07) 13 (0.10) 7.94 +0.13 (1.84%)
Leonardo Friman D 26 8 66 41.53% 4 (0.06) 8 (0.13) 6 (0.10) 10 (0.16) 6.68 -1.32 (-16.48%)
Hector Platt D 23 7 87 53.85% 5 (0.06) 8 (0.10) 4 (0.05) 9 (0.11) 6.11 -0.22 (-2.29%)
Ronnie Harvey D 34 7 64 40.41% 11 (0.18) 59 (0.96) 8 (0.13) 19 (0.31) 7.47 +0.47 (6.79%)
Geoff Pena D 33 7 25 16.06% 1 (0.04) 2 (0.08) 1 (0.04) 2 (0.08) 6.69 -0.31 (-4.40%)
Martin Manners D 22 6 31 17.98% 1 (0.04) 2 (0.07) 1 (0.04) 2 (0.07) 5.46 -0.12 (-1.59%)
Matthew Lowry D 19 6 32 19.22% 2 (0.07) 5 (0.17) 2 (0.07) 4 (0.14) 5.25 -0.56 (-9.27%)
Jacob Buhre D 31 6 42 26.09% 2 (0.05) 6 (0.15) 5 (0.13) 7 (0.18) 6.85 -0.13 (-1.64%)
Simon Bishop D 19 5 5 2.64%         4.00 -1.00 (-20.00%)
Jeffrey Hubbard D 18 5 3 1.97%         5.33 +0.33 (6.67%)
Mathew Whittaker D 16 4 2 1.16%         3.30 -0.70 (-17.50%)
Taylor Cort D 17 4 1 0.66%         6.70 +2.70 (67.50%)
Keichiro Hatafuku D 19 4 2 0.89%         3.20 -0.80 (-20.00%)
Hironobu Shiraishi M 29 11 148 94.16% 28 (0.20) 88 (0.62) 41 (0.29) 69 (0.48) 10.29 +0.66 (6.99%)
Cecil Fletcher M 28 10 131 85.96% 24 (0.18) 88 (0.67) 40 (0.31) 64 (0.49) 10.28 +1.10 (12.44%)
Ghita Asavoaie M 24 10 17 11.19% 3 (0.18) 10 (0.59) 1 (0.06) 4 (0.24) 9.53 -0.47 (-4.71%)
Stan Sharrock M 27 9 66 41.29% 9 (0.14) 21 (0.33) 16 (0.25) 25 (0.40) 7.58 -1.21 (-13.70%)
Fernando de Souza M 34 8 103 64.71% 33 (0.34) 89 (0.91) 16 (0.16) 49 (0.50) 9.30 +1.11 (13.79%)
Calvin Hall M 22 8 75 45.71% 9 (0.13) 34 (0.49) 16 (0.23) 25 (0.36) 7.88 +0.83 (12.79%)
Jungo Fukazawa M 27 8 123 75.94% 35 (0.30) 92 (0.80) 35 (0.30) 70 (0.61) 9.00 +0.97 (12.22%)
Mircea Nedelcu M 33 8 69 41.87% 17 (0.27) 33 (0.52) 16 (0.25) 33 (0.52) 8.71 +0.71 (8.91%)
Salvadore Jamelli M 26 6 23 11.91% 3 (0.17) 10 (0.55) 6 (0.33) 9 (0.50) 6.62 +0.14 (3.22%)
Mayer Simo M 29 6 14 9.21% 1 (0.07) 5 (0.36) 2 (0.14) 3 (0.21) 5.75 -0.25 (-4.17%)
Russ Nethercott M 21 5 14 5.36% 1 (0.12) 2 (0.25) 1 (0.12) 2 (0.25) 5.68 +0.68 (13.57%)
Kieron Shore M 26 5 7 3.11%     1 (0.21) 1 (0.21) 4.14 -0.86 (-17.14%)
Adrian Annon M 16 4 7 2.19%   1 (0.30)     4.14 +0.14 (3.57%)
Manny Glover M 17 4 1 0.66%         3.60 -0.40 (-10.00%)
Udo Kaluza S 29 8 91 54.67% 45 (0.54) 116 (1.40) 8 (0.10) 53 (0.64) 7.21 -0.63 (-7.84%)
Jarvis Armstrong S 32 6 80 46.61% 47 (0.66) 117 (1.65) 10 (0.14) 57 (0.80) 6.77 -0.19 (-2.67%)
Phil Jordan S 19 5 1 0.33%         6.00 +1.00 (20.00%)
Nils-Olof Sterner S 30 5 12 5.71% 4 (0.46) 9 (1.04) 2 (0.23) 6 (0.69) 5.41 -0.43 (-7.00%)
Evan Hankin S 18 4 4 1.50% 1 (0.44) 4 (1.75)   1 (0.44) 4.50 +0.50 (12.50%)
Eric Råberg S 20 4 1 0.05%         3.50 -0.50 (-12.50%)
Svante Wallentinsson S 25 4 6 1.87% 2 (0.70) 3 (1.05)   2 (0.70) 4.50 -
27.96% 296 858 277 573 6.46 -0.06 (-0.72%)
  1. Mulldoggs - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Hitmen (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  3. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Boca Juniors (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  4. F.C Nemesis - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Conmen (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Rhinos Kop - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Mafia (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  8. The Mafia - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Rhinos Kop (5 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  10. The Conmen - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - F.C Nemesis (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  12. Boca Juniors - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. The Hitmen - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Mulldoggs (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  15. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Ultimate Combo (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  16. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Muppets FC (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  17. 3rd Place FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  18. Real OG - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (5 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  19. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Royal Mounties (0 - 4) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  20. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  21. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Jamestown Thursdays (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  22. Langley City - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  23. Boca Juniors - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  24. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Arkham Inmates XI (5 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  25. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Hitmen (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  26. Moose Utd - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  27. g unit - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  28. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - g unit (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  29. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Moose Utd (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  30. The Hitmen - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  31. Arkham Inmates XI - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  32. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Boca Juniors (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  33. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Langley City (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  34. Jamestown Thursdays - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  35. RCD Hamada - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  36. Royal Mounties - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  37. Hibernia FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  38. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Keats FC (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  39. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Boca Badboys (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  40. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  41. Langley City - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  42. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Boca Juniors (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  43. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - F.C Nemesis (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  44. The Hitmen - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  45. VVV-Venlo - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  46. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Fanos United (3 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  47. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Penarol (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  48. Arkham Inmates XI - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  49. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Arkham Inmates XI (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  50. Penarol - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  51. Fanos United - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  52. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - VVV-Venlo (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  53. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Hitmen (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  54. F.C Nemesis - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  55. Boca Juniors - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  56. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Langley City (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  57. RCD Hamada - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  58. Top Of The Heap - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  59. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Pompey FC (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  60. Boca Badboys - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  61. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - F.C Nemesis (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  62. Penarol - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  63. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Hitmen (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  64. Crazy Train - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  65. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  66. Ultimate Combo - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  67. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Woodys Warriors (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  68. Zizilia FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  69. Lost and Confused - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  70. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Lost and Confused (2 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  71. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Zizilia FC (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  72. Woodys Warriors - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  73. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Ultimate Combo (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  74. RCD Hamada - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  75. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Crazy Train (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  76. The Hitmen - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  77. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Penarol (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  78. F.C Nemesis - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  79. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Renegades (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  80. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Boca Badboys (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  81. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Penarol (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  82. Crazy Train - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  83. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Ultimate Combo (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  84. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - F.C Nemesis (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  85. Zizilia FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  86. Fanos United - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  87. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - AFC Estuary (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  88. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Renegades (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  89. Hackem FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  90. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Hackem FC (1 - 6) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  91. Renegades - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  92. AFC Estuary - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  93. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Fanos United (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  94. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Zizilia FC (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  95. F.C Nemesis - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  96. Ultimate Combo - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  97. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Crazy Train (4 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  98. Penarol - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  99. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Boca Badboys (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  100. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Feyenoord (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  101. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - AFC Estuary (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  102. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Zapata F.C. (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  103. Fanos United - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (5 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  104. Lost and Confused - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  105. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  106. Feyenoord - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  107. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Penarol (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  108. Renegades - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  109. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Hutchie Vale (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  110. Hutchie Vale - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  111. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Renegades (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  112. Penarol - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  113. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Feyenoord (3 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  114. RCD Hamada - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  115. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Lost and Confused (0 - 4) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  116. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Fanos United (3 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  117. Zapata F.C. - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  118. AFC Estuary - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  119. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Mumbai City FC (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  120. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Arkham Inmates XI (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  121. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  122. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Pompey FC (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  123. Renegades - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  124. DibDab II - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  125. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Lost and Confused (3 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  126. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Under Dogs (0 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  127. Hackem FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  128. Hutchie Vale - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (5 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  129. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Hutchie Vale (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  130. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Hackem FC (4 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  131. Under Dogs - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  132. Lost and Confused - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  133. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - DibDab II (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  134. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Renegades (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  135. Pompey FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  136. RCD Hamada - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  137. Arkham Inmates XI - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  138. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Scullys Elite (4 - 6) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  139. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Mighty TractorBoyz (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  140. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Boca Badboys (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  141. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Fanos United (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  142. Feyenoord - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  143. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Uruguay X1 (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  144. VVV-Venlo - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  145. Dogs Of War FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  146. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  147. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Tartan trippers (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  148. Hackem FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  149. Lost and Confused - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  150. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - AFC Estuary (0 - 4) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  151. AFC Estuary - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top

About :: FAQ :: Changelog :: Last updated: Wed Oct 24 01:01:28 2012.