<

Overview :: Fat Dog Big Rovers res

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Frederico Campilho K 28 10 17 90.45%         8.28 -1.72 (-17.24%)
Jordan Tillery K 30 7 2 9.01%         6.90 -0.10 (-1.43%)
Bento Galvão D 29 10 18 99.46% 1 (0.06) 3 (0.17)   1 (0.06) 11.37 +2.31 (25.52%)
Ronnie Harvey D 34 7 18 97.24% 2 (0.11) 18 (1.02) 3 (0.17) 5 (0.28) 7.96 +0.96 (13.65%)
Finn-Arne Zachariassen D 24 7 18 94.41%   2 (0.12)     7.32 +0.32 (4.52%)
Geoff Pena D 33 7 1 5.53%         7.50 +0.50 (7.14%)
Jacob Buhre D 31 6 8 35.38%   1 (0.16)     7.35 +0.48 (7.62%)
Hector Platt D 18 5 9 49.25% 1 (0.11) 2 (0.22) 1 (0.11) 2 (0.22) 6.86 +1.86 (37.11%)
Hironobu Shiraishi M 25 9 18 97.24% 2 (0.11) 6 (0.34) 7 (0.40) 9 (0.51) 10.61 +1.61 (17.90%)
Jungo Fukazawa M 24 9 17 92.49% 9 (0.54) 21 (1.25) 7 (0.42) 16 (0.96) 10.60 +2.54 (31.56%)
Cecil Fletcher M 24 9 18 98.68% 2 (0.11) 12 (0.67) 9 (0.50) 11 (0.62) 10.61 +2.55 (31.79%)
Fernando de Souza M 32 8 18 99.04% 6 (0.33) 24 (1.34) 2 (0.11) 8 (0.45) 10.03 +2.03 (25.42%)
Mircea Nedelcu M 32 8 17 90.81% 5 (0.30) 11 (0.67) 3 (0.18) 8 (0.49) 10.08 +2.08 (25.96%)
Salvadore Jamelli M 25 6 7 17.72% 1 (0.31) 2 (0.62) 3 (0.94) 4 (1.25) 7.73 +1.73 (28.81%)
Russ Nethercott M 19 5 3 1.32%         5.57 +0.57 (11.33%)
Jarvis Armstrong S 29 7 14 74.23% 11 (0.82) 25 (1.86) 3 (0.22) 14 (1.04) 7.53 +0.53 (7.55%)
Udo Kaluza S 25 7 8 40.60% 3 (0.41) 6 (0.82) 1 (0.14) 4 (0.54) 7.17 -0.70 (-8.66%)
Nils-Olof Sterner S 30 5 2 0.78%     1 (7.08) 1 (7.08) 5.15 +0.15 (3.00%)
Eric Råberg S 20 4 1 0.42%         3.50 -0.50 (-12.50%)
57.58% 43 133 40 83 8.01 + 0.91 (12.58%)
  1. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  2. Langley City - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Boca Juniors (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - F.C Nemesis (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  5. The Hitmen - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. VVV-Venlo - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Fanos United (3 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Penarol (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  9. Arkham Inmates XI - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Arkham Inmates XI (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  11. Penarol - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Fanos United - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - VVV-Venlo (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Hitmen (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  15. F.C Nemesis - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Boca Juniors - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Langley City (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-3-2]
  18. RCD Hamada - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top