| < | Overview :: Fat Dog Big Rovers res |
> |
| Name | Position | Age | Skill | Special | # | Pitch time | Goals | Chances | Assists | A. Chances | Avg. grade | Performance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frederico Campilho | K | 29 | 11 | |
16 | 83.92% | 9.02 | -1.04 (-10.27%) | |||||
| Jo Markussen | K | 27 | 8 | |
2 | 10.30% | 5.85 | -2.15 (-26.88%) | |||||
| Bento Galvão | D | 30 | 10 | |
18 | 99.76% | 7 (0.39) | 7 (0.39) | 7 (0.39) | 12.18 | +2.18 (21.78%) | ||
| Finn-Arne Zachariassen | D | 25 | 8 | |
18 | 98.49% | 1 (0.06) | 2 (0.11) | 1 (0.06) | 2 (0.11) | 8.41 | +1.36 (19.46%) | |
| Ronnie Harvey | D | 34 | 7 | |
7 | 33.13% | 2 (0.33) | 7.50 | +0.50 (7.14%) | ||||
| Martin Manners | D | 20 | 6 | |
14 | 68.61% | 5.23 | +0.16 (3.62%) | |||||
| Hector Platt | D | 20 | 6 | |
16 | 87.95% | 1 (0.06) | 1 (0.06) | 1 (0.06) | 5.72 | -0.28 (-4.58%) | ||
| Hironobu Shiraishi | M | 26 | 10 | |
18 | 99.76% | 8 (0.44) | 16 (0.89) | 6 (0.33) | 14 (0.78) | 10.72 | +1.67 (18.64%) | |
| Cecil Fletcher | M | 25 | 10 | |
18 | 99.76% | 4 (0.22) | 11 (0.61) | 4 (0.22) | 8 (0.44) | 10.56 | +1.51 (16.79%) | |
| Fernando de Souza | M | 33 | 9 | |
17 | 86.93% | 7 (0.45) | 14 (0.89) | 4 (0.26) | 11 (0.70) | 10.05 | +1.99 (24.77%) | |
| Jungo Fukazawa | M | 25 | 9 | |
16 | 81.02% | 6 (0.41) | 15 (1.03) | 8 (0.55) | 14 (0.96) | 9.46 | +0.46 (5.07%) | |
| Mircea Nedelcu | M | 32 | 8 | |
12 | 56.87% | 4 (0.39) | 9 (0.88) | 3 (0.29) | 7 (0.68) | 9.34 | +1.34 (16.77%) | |
| Calvin Hall | M | 19 | 6 | |
8 | 37.89% | 8 (1.17) | 2 (0.29) | 2 (0.29) | 6.50 | +1.38 (27.92%) | ||
| Salvadore Jamelli | M | 26 | 6 | |
1 | 5.54% | 4.00 | -2.00 (-33.33%) | |||||
| Russ Nethercott | M | 21 | 5 | |
7 | 31.02% | 1 (0.18) | 1 (0.18) | 1 (0.18) | 5.69 | +0.69 (13.71%) | ||
| Udo Kaluza | S | 26 | 8 | |
13 | 68.01% | 9 (0.73) | 20 (1.63) | 1 (0.08) | 10 (0.81) | 7.12 | +0.04 (0.69%) | |
| Jarvis Armstrong | S | 31 | 7 | |
10 | 48.37% | 1 (0.11) | 11 (1.26) | 2 (0.23) | 3 (0.34) | 7.33 | +0.33 (4.71%) | |
| 64.55% | 40 | 117 | 40 | 80 | 7.92 | + 0.48 ( 6.24%) |
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - F.C Nemesis (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Penarol - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - The Hitmen (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Crazy Train - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
Ultimate Combo - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Woodys Warriors (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
Zizilia FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
Lost and Confused - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Lost and Confused (2 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Zizilia FC (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
Woodys Warriors - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Ultimate Combo (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
RCD Hamada - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Crazy Train (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
The Hitmen - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Penarol (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
F.C Nemesis - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]