<

Overview :: Fat Dog Big Rovers res

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Frederico Campilho K 29 11 17 93.76%         10.29 -0.71 (-6.42%)
Jo Markussen K 28 8 1 5.52%         7.00 -1.00 (-12.50%)
Bento Galvão D 30 10 17 92.63%   5 (0.30) 8 (0.48) 8 (0.48) 10.94 +0.94 (9.41%)
Leonardo Friman D 23 8 18 94.96%   2 (0.12) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 5.89 -2.11 (-26.39%)
Finn-Arne Zachariassen D 25 8 17 90.17%   1 (0.06)     7.82 -0.18 (-2.21%)
Martin Manners D 20 6 5 24.64%         5.40 -0.60 (-10.00%)
Hector Platt D 20 6 15 72.66% 3 (0.23) 3 (0.23)   3 (0.23) 6.20 +0.20 (3.33%)
Jeffrey Hubbard D 18 5 3 16.55%         5.33 +0.33 (6.67%)
Hironobu Shiraishi M 26 10 18 93.94% 1 (0.06) 14 (0.82) 5 (0.29) 6 (0.35) 10.83 +0.83 (8.33%)
Cecil Fletcher M 25 10 18 97.96% 4 (0.23) 11 (0.62) 6 (0.34) 10 (0.56) 10.50 +0.50 (5.00%)
Fernando de Souza M 33 9 16 86.87% 8 (0.51) 16 (1.02) 1 (0.06) 9 (0.57) 9.31 +0.31 (3.47%)
Jungo Fukazawa M 25 9 15 73.50% 2 (0.15) 8 (0.60) 2 (0.15) 4 (0.30) 9.40 +0.40 (4.44%)
Stan Sharrock M 24 8 14 68.11% 2 (0.16) 7 (0.57) 1 (0.08) 3 (0.24) 7.21 -0.79 (-9.82%)
Mircea Nedelcu M 33 8 2 5.34%         8.00 -
Calvin Hall M 19 6 13 57.97% 1 (0.10) 4 (0.38) 5 (0.48) 6 (0.57) 7.15 +1.15 (19.23%)
Russ Nethercott M 21 5 4 12.71% 1 (0.43) 1 (0.43)   1 (0.43) 5.75 +0.75 (15.00%)
Udo Kaluza S 26 8 15 67.81% 10 (0.81) 20 (1.63) 1 (0.08) 11 (0.89) 7.80 -0.20 (-2.50%)
Jarvis Armstrong S 31 7 11 35.67% 4 (0.62) 8 (1.24) 1 (0.15) 5 (0.77) 6.64 -0.36 (-5.19%)
Svante Wallentinsson S 22 6 1 1.32%         5.00 -1.00 (-16.67%)
57.48% 36 100 31 67 7.71 -0.09 (-0.93%)
  1. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Penarol (5 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  2. Crazy Train - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Ultimate Combo (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  4. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - F.C Nemesis (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  5. Zizilia FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Fanos United - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - AFC Estuary (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  8. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Renegades (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  9. Hackem FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Hackem FC (1 - 6) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  11. Renegades - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  12. AFC Estuary - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Fanos United (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Zizilia FC (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  15. F.C Nemesis - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Ultimate Combo - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Crazy Train (4 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  18. Penarol - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top