<

Overview :: Bottom Of The Heap

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Caleb Hiscock K 26 7 9 46.42%         9.00 +2.00 (28.57%)
Konstantin Jiannou K 18 4 10 52.39%         4.40 +0.40 (10.00%)
Dag-Ivar Angeltveit D 32 10 18 98.81% 1 (0.06) 3 (0.17) 4 (0.22) 5 (0.28) 11.50 +1.50 (15.00%)
Rupert Deeney D 31 8 17 92.90% 4 (0.24) 14 (0.83) 1 (0.06) 5 (0.30) 9.76 +1.76 (22.06%)
Samson Sharrock D 24 8 17 78.16%   1 (0.07) 3 (0.21) 3 (0.21) 9.29 +1.29 (16.18%)
Keith Newton D 26 7 7 21.18%         8.00 +1.00 (14.29%)
Carlo Lo Gatto D 17 4 17 71.54%     2 (0.15) 2 (0.15) 4.53 +0.53 (13.24%)
Bernardo Eder M 34 10 18 98.81% 3 (0.17) 10 (0.56) 3 (0.17) 6 (0.33) 11.00 +1.00 (10.00%)
Leopold Fraser M 26 8 18 86.10% 1 (0.06) 9 (0.57) 4 (0.26) 5 (0.32) 9.22 +1.22 (15.28%)
Jonathon Stephenson M 19 6 18 97.85% 11 (0.62) 25 (1.40) 8 (0.45) 19 (1.07) 8.61 +2.61 (43.52%)
Wallace Bloomfield M 27 6 11 51.07% 2 (0.21) 5 (0.54) 2 (0.21) 4 (0.43) 7.45 +1.45 (24.24%)
Monty Potts M 24 6 1 3.70%         6.00 -
Walton Churchill M 18 5 18 91.77%   5 (0.30) 4 (0.24) 4 (0.24) 6.94 +1.94 (38.89%)
Herbert Trundle S 26 9 15 71.18% 8 (0.62) 15 (1.16) 1 (0.08) 9 (0.69) 8.60 -0.40 (-4.44%)
Pierre Paulus S 18 4 17 59.67% 5 (0.46) 9 (0.83)   5 (0.46) 4.29 +0.29 (7.35%)
Casian Pamfil S 17 4 16 65.33% 3 (0.25) 10 (0.84) 1 (0.08) 4 (0.34) 4.31 +0.31 (7.81%)
67.93% 38 106 33 71 7.68 + 1.13 (17.47%)
  1. Bottom Of The Heap - Sauchie Dwarf Tossers (4 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Bottom Of The Heap - AS Azzurri di Milano (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Scullys Elite - Bottom Of The Heap (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-2-3]
  4. Barnstoneworth United - Bottom Of The Heap (0 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-4-3]
  5. Bottom Of The Heap - Ynot Strikers fc (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  6. The OojaNicka Bolockovs - Bottom Of The Heap (1 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Bottom Of The Heap - Rams (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  8. River Plate - Bottom Of The Heap (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Bottom Of The Heap - Dodge Chargers (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  10. Dodge Chargers - Bottom Of The Heap (1 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Bottom Of The Heap - River Plate (3 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Rams - Bottom Of The Heap (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. Bottom Of The Heap - The OojaNicka Bolockovs (3 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  14. Ynot Strikers fc - Bottom Of The Heap (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  15. Bottom Of The Heap - Barnstoneworth United (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-2-4]
  16. Bottom Of The Heap - Scullys Elite (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  17. AS Azzurri di Milano - Bottom Of The Heap (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  18. Sauchie Dwarf Tossers - Bottom Of The Heap (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top