<

Overview :: Under Dogs

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Mayer McCheese K 28 10 19 94.51%         10.42 +0.42 (4.21%)
Jeremias Alford D 31 11 16 82.98%   2 (0.13) 2 (0.13) 2 (0.13) 12.69 +1.69 (15.34%)
Rio Mulholland D 25 10 18 89.82% 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12) 12.39 +2.39 (23.89%)
Johnny Wicker D 30 10 10 38.63%     1 (0.13) 1 (0.13) 11.40 +1.40 (14.00%)
Gianni Bompensero D 27 10 19 85.52% 9 (0.55) 19 (1.16) 1 (0.06) 10 (0.61) 12.00 +2.00 (20.00%)
Klaus Os D 23 8 18 91.29%         9.44 +1.44 (18.06%)
Flavio Parreira D 19 4 2 6.39%         4.50 +0.50 (12.50%)
Harry Pertwee M 28 12 19 98.87% 14 (0.74) 25 (1.32) 2 (0.11) 16 (0.84) 13.16 +1.16 (9.65%)
Aksel Holm-Nielsen M 26 10 13 59.95% 2 (0.17) 7 (0.61) 1 (0.09) 3 (0.26) 11.08 +1.08 (10.77%)
Wolfram Pinske M 33 10 17 82.18% 3 (0.19) 10 (0.63) 11 (0.70) 14 (0.89) 12.06 +2.06 (20.59%)
Gary Arely M 29 9 19 95.36% 1 (0.05) 5 (0.27) 7 (0.38) 8 (0.44) 11.11 +2.11 (23.39%)
Antonio Skinner M 26 9 19 95.59% 4 (0.22) 10 (0.54) 5 (0.27) 9 (0.49) 10.47 +1.47 (16.37%)
Adam Barry M 17 4 15 57.01%   1 (0.09)     4.73 +0.73 (18.33%)
Jody Banks S 29 10 14 57.69% 4 (0.36) 7 (0.63)   4 (0.36) 10.00 -
Ludwig Knopf S 24 8 14 51.75% 5 (0.50) 8 (0.80) 3 (0.30) 8 (0.80) 10.07 +2.07 (25.89%)
72.50% 43 95 34 77 10.37 + 1.47 (16.64%)
  1. Renegades - Under Dogs (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Under Dogs - Lost and Confused (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  3. Under Dogs - Hackem FC (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Arkham Inmates XI - Under Dogs (3 - 4) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  5. Pompey FC - Under Dogs (3 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Under Dogs - DibDab II (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-2-3]
  7. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Under Dogs (0 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Under Dogs - Hutchie Vale (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  9. RCD Hamada - Under Dogs (0 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Under Dogs - RCD Hamada (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  11. Hutchie Vale - Under Dogs (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Under Dogs - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  13. DibDab II - Under Dogs (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Under Dogs - Pompey FC (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  15. Under Dogs - Arkham Inmates XI (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  16. Hackem FC - Under Dogs (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. Lost and Confused - Under Dogs (0 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  18. Under Dogs - Renegades (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  19. RCD Hamada - Under Dogs (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top