<

Overview :: Fat Dog Big Rovers res

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Frederico Campilho K 31 11 12 62.80%         10.25 -0.75 (-6.82%)
Jo Markussen K 30 8 1 5.23%         6.00 -2.00 (-25.00%)
Bento Galvão D 32 10 16 74.40%   4 (0.28) 1 (0.07) 1 (0.07) 11.56 +1.56 (15.62%)
Finn-Arne Zachariassen D 27 9 18 90.73%         8.89 -0.11 (-1.23%)
Leonardo Friman D 25 8 16 79.52% 1 (0.07) 2 (0.13) 4 (0.26) 5 (0.33) 6.75 -1.25 (-15.62%)
Hector Platt D 22 7 16 83.73%     1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 5.62 -1.38 (-19.64%)
Matthew Lowry D 18 6 16 79.75%   2 (0.13) 2 (0.13) 2 (0.13) 4.38 -1.62 (-27.08%)
Simon Bishop D 19 5 5 20.99%         4.00 -1.00 (-20.00%)
Hironobu Shiraishi M 28 11 18 92.72% 5 (0.28) 13 (0.73) 2 (0.11) 7 (0.40) 12.06 +1.06 (9.60%)
Ghita Asavoaie M 23 10 4 20.93% 1 (0.25) 4 (1.00)   1 (0.25) 8.25 -1.75 (-17.50%)
Cecil Fletcher M 27 10 19 99.43% 1 (0.05) 10 (0.53) 4 (0.21) 5 (0.26) 11.00 +1.00 (10.00%)
Stan Sharrock M 26 9 19 94.65% 1 (0.06) 3 (0.17) 7 (0.39) 8 (0.44) 7.16 -1.84 (-20.47%)
Calvin Hall M 21 8 19 98.41% 2 (0.11) 9 (0.48) 1 (0.05) 3 (0.16) 8.21 +0.21 (2.63%)
Jungo Fukazawa M 27 8 14 68.37% 5 (0.38) 9 (0.69) 2 (0.15) 7 (0.54) 9.29 +1.29 (16.07%)
Adrian Annon M 16 4 7 17.41%   1 (0.30)     4.14 +0.14 (3.57%)
Udo Kaluza S 28 8 19 94.14% 9 (0.50) 31 (1.72) 3 (0.17) 12 (0.67) 6.32 -1.68 (-21.05%)
Svante Wallentinsson S 24 4 3 10.52% 2 (0.99) 2 (0.99)   2 (0.99) 4.00 -
64.34% 27 90 27 54 7.52 -0.51 (-7.31%)
  1. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Arkham Inmates XI (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - RCD Hamada (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Pompey FC (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  4. Renegades - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. DibDab II - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Lost and Confused (3 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Under Dogs (0 - 5) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Hackem FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Hutchie Vale - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (5 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Hutchie Vale (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  11. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Hackem FC (4 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Under Dogs - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Lost and Confused - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - DibDab II (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  15. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Renegades (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Pompey FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  17. RCD Hamada - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  18. Arkham Inmates XI - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  19. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Scullys Elite (4 - 6) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top